• Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is the political landscape in a nutshell. Someone from the left makes a statement backed by reality about bettering society then someone on the right says some childish shit and name calls. How perfect.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Are you even capable of having a mature, adult conversation? Without all this school yard stuff and insults, just facts and we’ll formed stances on topics.

            Let me ask this, after Trump’s time in office what did he accomplish that helps you? You said we’ll having nothing to show, what do you have to show from Trump? He decreased taxes for the rich, so if you’re rich I get it, otherwise I’m curious.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              49
              ·
              3 months ago

              None of them every done anything for me that’s why I am not longer voting either party.

              Third party to deny regime legitimacy is my thesis.

              Walz has good record but this a nothing burger since Kamala is the nominee.

              If Walz so good, why not make him the nominee?

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                24
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                They do numerous things that impact you. If you don’t realize this then you’re just uniformed. I don’t say that to be mean, but if you think laws, policies, and elections don’t impact you at all then you’re just wrong. Taxes, medical costs, gas prices through negotiations, involvement in wars, infrastructure bills, holding companies accountable, immigration policies, gun laws, just to name a few. Take whatever things you care most about and I guarantee politics impacts them in some way.

                Walz is good, but he doesn’t have the experience she has. But the VP plays a role in politics and is second in line to the leader of our country, them being a good person is important.

                You seem to be of the mind that they all do nothing and all this discourse is pointless BS, so why are you even here? Why waste your time reading a post title about politics, click into it, then engage in a conversation?

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  32
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  None of it benefits me… They are extracting value out of me so yeah sure they are robbing has a bad impact on me lol

              • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                3 months ago

                They’re all the ‘same’ so … still voting for the guaranteed worst in case you’re wrong.

                Are you getting enough sleep?

          • arglebargle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you ever actually read his platform? Look into what he has done? Tim has sound and practical reasons for … guess what… doing the right thing.

            Feed school children for example. Turns out the grades go up and truancy goes down. Juvenile crime goes down. An educated workforce makes for better wages and a happier populace. He will tell you that… in plain English.

            Instead of blaming everyone else and calling names he, you know, fills potholes and offers solutions. He isn’t perfect, but you calling names and acting like an ass with no actuall reasons is just pathetic.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          3 months ago

          There is no art to counter propaganda beyond noting that not everybody is larping regime propaganda for the readers.

          News and Politics subs are cess pool.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        He’s gonna be VP. No one likes your guy and his couchfucker friend. Mald about it.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is fucking insane. He wants them to create housing immediately, as if building things like apartments doesn’t take time.

    Bad enough that the camps are being broken up. They literally have nowhere to go but prison. Oh well, at least the private prisons are making their slave quotas.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      3 months ago

      He wants them to create housing immediately, as if building things like apartments doesn’t take time.

      He says that occasionally, but that’s not really what he wants, he just wants homeless people gone out of sight and out of the minds of his donors and their customers. If they disappear into housing that’s fine, but he’s ok with other solutions too so long as they happen now now now

      Los Angeles County, in particular, has become a frequent target of Newsom’s ire. The governor again criticized the county on Thursday for delaying implementation of a law that expands the criteria for people to be detained against their will.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Absolutely. He’s not an idiot. He knows he’s asking the impossible when he says shit like this.

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          When is the cocksucker up for relection. We need to Primary him and remove him from politics at least as a Democrat. He fucking DINO and horrible human being. He should join the GOP because everything he does reminds me of them.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Welp, buy them all involuntary bus tickets to South Park then… that’ll solve the issue permanently. /s

        • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          it would be impolite to say so though. 🤷‍♀️ sorry. can’t listen, you’re rude for accusing someone of doing something only a total piece of shit would do, implying that he’s a total piece of shit. what kind person would even DO that?

          maybe we could listen to you if you also said it was fine and good?

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Especially if it doesn’t hurt his electabity. I think he’s quite ambitious and that motivates him.

        Besides, what does a career politician do after governorship?

        Corporate boards?

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Forced prison labor is determined by state, not by ownership. There are Federal prisons in many states that use slave labor, socialized by our tax money.

      Your point still stands though.

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Apartments take a few months to build. There are standard designs they build over an over again in different locations. I realize CA has earthquakes and maybe cannot take a design from Ohio (though I wouldn’t be surprised if they could), but there should be plenty of designs that meet codes. If they cannot build thousands of apartments in a year the problem isn’t the time it is they are doing something to make it not possible to build that fast.

      Building should be by right - no need to ask the neighbors for permission or get a review (for a standard design that doesn’t do anything unusual), just half hour to get the permit and then a few routine inspections along the way.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        You read what he’s saying in the article, because the implication is pretty clear that he’s saying, “you house these people right now or else” as if that’s possible.

        • bluGill@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          He has been threatening for a while now. If they haven’t made significant progress it is because they are not trying to.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            If they haven’t made significant progress it is because they are not trying to.

            Bullshit. They have to deal with a bunch of NIMBYism.

            • bluGill@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              They refers to the people of the county in question - which is where those NIMBYs live and thus those who are not trying.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Wow. My building was finished 6 months ago after a 3-year process.

        I envy your comparatively-overnight build. Pouring the foundation (parking) alone is a month for 5 storeys for the new one going in next door, and then concrete for each level is at least another fortnight. That’s like a year alone just for the concrete skeleton, let alone the infrastructure and then build of the units.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    maybe California shouldn’t have a 3-5 YEAR waitlist for section 8/Housing Choice Vouchers housing?

    maybe they should force all those empty retail/commercial/industrial/residential properties to be put to use or forced to hand over to the state.

    maybe the church of scientology shouldnt be allowed to own thousands of buildings in california with no stated purposed or published staff?

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Maybe they should also start building more apartments at rent controlled rates?

      Its not just about the empty spots. Those are owned.

      Its about the rich people denying apartments to maintain the clean skyline.

      Edit: added also

      • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah, I’m with Num10ck. There are more than enough houses with existing infrastructure to utilities. Putting up more homes is wasteful and adds carbon into the air.

        The state has the power to levy a heavy vacancy tax on unoccupied spaces. I think thats the best route to getting people housed.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh I also agree we need to tax unoccupied housing. On a sliding scale too since there are land barons rampant in our nation.

          This would force real estate companies to fill homes that costs them loads to keep empty. Instantly increasing supply and thus cost of rent goes down.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Rent control disincentivizes building new apartments though. That is, if I take out a load of debt to build a $10M apartment, and due to rent control my profit is going to be capped at levels that are probably below what I could get through low-risk treasury bills, why would I build anything? Sure, you can get it built by the state, but states have a distressing tendency to stop adequately funding required infrastructure and not do necessary maintenance in a timely fashion (more so than most shitty apartment complexes even).

        I entirely agree that NIMBYs need to be steamrolled though. High-density housing is far, far better than sprawl.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      My wet dream is dead malls converted to indoor cities. Turn old shops into efficiency apartments, the huge end cap stores like Boscovs into grocery stores, food court into cafeteria-style dining. Hell, even keep some food places or shops if you want to get some capitalists hard. Just charge them rent out the ass in exchange for a nearly captive consumer base and use the funds to improve the place.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      maybe California shouldn’t have a 3-5 YEAR waitlist for section 8/Housing Choice Vouchers housing?

      I live in a deep red state and it’s that wait, or more, here, and I believe it’s a lottery system, at that.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      He has done that. Not defending his homelessness position. Only saying he’s mandated housing creation.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    Breaking up homeless encampments doesn’t fix the fact that these people have nowhere to live! What a cruel policy.

    Why not emminent domain overpriced apartment buildings owned by the Saudis, Chinese, and Russians, and give the apartments away the homeless. Problem solved.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, so simple!

      Those apartments world devolve into a human trafficking, crime ridden drug overdose havens in no time. Mental health support for them is needed first.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 months ago

        You get them in a stable living arrangement first, and then that makes mental health support exponentially easier.

        Housing first policies work everywhere they’re tried.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I never understood people like you. That the moment you help someone, the result will obviously be the worst outcome? So better not help them at all?

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          You don’t understand because your never consider the consequences of your actions.

          Providing shelter for everyone is a basic human need.

          But forcing mentally ill people mixed together with financially downtrodden unhoused people into a Kowloon City type environment without considering their ability to maintain their cleanliness and safety without imposing jack-booted level of policing is another level of stupid I can’t force out of you without an hours long face-to-face lecture where you and I can discuss like two friendly normal people.

          • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            “force your opinion out of you over an hours long conversation like a normal friendly person”

            time for some self reflection there, baroque

            i happen to agree with you too, as would i think anyone who has spent time in an american projects or shelter system, but youve so thoroughly poisoned the argument i cant take it up here.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Providing shelter for everyone is a basic human need.

            I agree. So let’s start with the basic human need. Nobody suggested we stop there and wash our hands of it saying “problem solved.”

  • Waveform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The safety net has people-sized holes in it. I nearly became homeless in June, and it wasn’t the state that came through for me, it was a relative. Even though I’m stll sleeping on a porch, I count myself lucky.

    The programs that are supposed to help people stay housed are failing: not enough funds for housing vouchers, restrictions too high for enrollment, and waiting lists too long for practicality.

    And Gavin is a wannabe autocrat. If it weren’t for him and his vetomania, we would have legalized natural psychedelics in CA by now. But no, instead we have people out there getting sick from sketchy products. And it seems like it’s the same with everything: do the exact opposite of helping while making it look like you care.

    Edit: there are decent leaders out there though, such as this mayor who lived as a homeless man for a week to gain some insight on the matter.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      A large number of the homeless people in L.A. have jobs. It’s just ridiculously expensive to live there, so they end up living in their cars or a tent.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most homeless people are invisible ie you can’t tell they are homeless.

        They got work, they get by as hard as it is.

        But fake teevee always showing junkies on teevee, and act like they all deserve it.

        🤡

      • Waveform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s what I’ve heard as well. Passing them on the street you’d probably think they weren’t even homeless at all. Not everyone finds it possible to get their life together that much, though :/

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t know about L.A. in specific, but-

          a 2021 study from the University of Chicago estimates that 53% of people living in homeless shelters and 40% of unsheltered people were employed, either full or part-time, in the year that people were observed homeless between 2011 – 2018.

          https://endhomelessness.org/blog/employed-and-experiencing-homelessness-what-the-numbers-show/

          And that was all pre-COVID and housing bubble, obviously.

          There are over 650,000 homeless in America now. So even if it’s only 40% of those…

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            650k is the visible homeless, my understanding there is another million of people who are not visible homeless.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need real leadership when it comes to affordable housing, instead we get this.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am so, so glad that Newsom wasn’t seriously in the running to be VP. This will hopefully tank his chances of ever running for president.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Send them to the conservative states like they sent immigrants via bus and plane to liberal states. Seeing as they say they have low homelessness problems it must mean they have a solution that will help these people, right? Prove those lib states wrong.

  • catch22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I lived in peace and humanity first Berkeley, Ca for 10 years a bastion of liberalism taken to the extreme. For 10 years I voted repeatedly in local elections for more affordable housing and zoning changes to make it easier to develop taller buildings and rezone areas for housing development. In the time I was there I think I can count on 1 hand the number of apartment and housing developments I saw being erected. Every damn election people voted against zoning changes and shot them down. We eventually had kids and guess what, there was no place for us to raise a family. So we moved out of state. Californians have nobody but themselves to blame for the homelessness problem the NIMBYism there is to the stratosphere. They shit talk about places like Texas, but guess what? At least there people have a place to live, which is more than I can say for the majority of cities in California.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      They shit talk about places like Texas, but guess what? At least there people have a place to live, which is more than I can say for the majority of cities in California.

      Texas busses their homeless to Cali. Also, good luck surviving winter in Texas if a power outage is enough to kill people lol