![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/c0cfeb4a-171a-4594-81b2-2916cf0f063a.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3d9e0457-3afb-4203-98e1-35253454ecbe.png)
wear sunscreen
wear sunscreen
send more cancer pics
Nah, if you were ashamed of the shit you wouldn’t have done the shit. What you are is embarrassed to have been caught.
b a n a n a
“my bad bro, i forgot to tell you guys about the open notorious corruption.”
-Tom “Uncomfortuncle” Clarence
Take a position? No, that might hurt someone’s feelings.
“Look what you made me do.”
hi, I hate an echo chamber.
Oh, well. Democracy is saved!
This is extremely dangerous for our democracy?
That frankly depends on your social status and how literally you want to define the word “eat.”
Maybe this guy is a false flag, trying to poison the slight groundswell against .ml by presenting such a despicable persona as supporting it?
My money’s on the big brain psyop.
Would you have told Johnathan Swift to add /s to his Modest Proposal?
It’s a shame to see such a nice building burned just because a few dozen thousand people got genocided.
I’m ‘seriously considering’ getting a Prince Albert.
You don’t just get to make an assertive claim without supporting evidence, even if it’s in contradiction of another assertive claim. That which can be asserted without evidence (like the opinion you express here, supported by the merest incredulity) can be dismissed without evidence (like everyone here is doing of your opinion).
If you want to contradict the claim made without asserting your own claim contrary to, you must actually address the evidences for that claim, undermining, subverting, proving them false. This, successfully done, would lead an outside skeptic to the null hypothesis of “I don’t know,” rather than your frankly misogynistic hypothesis of, paraphrasing, “women don’t know what they’re talking about.”
Light goes in, volts come out, you can’t explain it!