For me it’s probably speech therapy and everything pertaining to that. I’m yet to encounter someone on here who is one apart from me (in training).

What about you?

  • Cheesus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Plumbing, since I’ve been a professional plumber in both North America and Europe. Not the most interesting knowledge base but alas, it is what it is. Other than that, Age of Empires II maybe?

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Graded Modal Dependent Type Theory, but that’s mostly because only “dozens of” people know it exists.

    • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What kind of grading do you give there? I guess the modal part is about the contexts for the type theory, but it has been some time I have looked into it.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I think “graded” in the name is there in contrast to “quantitative” type theory, which doesn’t have modalities/quantities at the type-level.

        The “modal” is borrowed from modal logic. If you pick the correct semiring, you can recover linearity and affine-ity and the other substructural logic pieces.

        The quantitative semiring I’ve been working with is 0, 1, ?, n, +, *, which I think will let me use static analysis to do very precise non-strictness and precise/early resource tracking/release. (But, my progress is so slow, that if this were an academic project, I don’t think I’d be getting any more grant funding.)

        • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I see, having modalities on type level makes sense as a grading, alike the grading of e.g. polynomial rings.

          So you are going along the line of linearity and affine-ity? What kind of stuff are you working out?

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            https://gitlab.com/bss03/grtt is my published code. But, I have far more intuitions that I need to write code for than finished code.

            While evaluating something well-typed under a context, the heap: does not need to contain a value for a binder with modality 0, must contain a single, strict value for a binder with a modality 1, must contain a single, lazy closure for a binder with a modality of ?, must contain multiple references to a shared, strict value for a binder with a modality n, must contain at least a single reference to a strict value for a binder with a modality of +, must contain at least a single reference to a lazy closure for a binder with a modality of *. Since the typing rules propagate the modalities to subterms precisely, we should be able to identify the exact point a closure must be forced to a value (or dropped) before runtime. That’s in addition to being able to compile linear functions to heap updates, eliminating at least some allocations.

            There’s some similarities with both the exact-use-count and relevant-or-erased semirings, but I think some things (e.g. around sums) are hard/awkward/impossible to type and the ?/+/* modalities make some make things easier while still allowing the abstract machine to know exactly when to “optimize the heap” based on a runtime flow that “activates” a particular static analysis.

            Of course, it’s still MLTT “compatible” – anything that would type-check in MLTT should type-check in my variation of GRTT by “simply” using the * modality everywhere – so you get full proofs-as-programs and a total language.

            I’m probably a bit off in the weeds, but it still makes my brain buzz to think about and occasionally I’ll make progress. I’ve been a little bit distracted with https://gitlab.com/bss03/nested which should allow me to write the abstract machine as a fold, but as proven to be place I can also put a lot of programming time into (again, with sporadic real progress).

            • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Interesting. Do you have some specific goal in mind? Like, implementing a language/library for the GRTT stuff.

              • bss03@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Sure, eventually, I’d like a language with Haskell-ish syntax to compile to Linux x86_64 and webassembly and use the language to make better software. If my language existed today, I’d probably work on writing my own ActivityPub software, and improve/port https://github.com/NARBEHOUSE/Ben-s-Software- because my father might want it soon.

  • I undoubtedly know more about fire than the average user here.

    I’m a circus performer with a decade of experience with fire performance/tech/safety. I teach other fire performers from beginners to professionals.

      • I started with fire spinning as a hobby and attending events. Eventually I got to manage a fire venue, received an invite to join a historic circus (Coney Island), and became a fire safety lead for a large fire retreat. The most important pillar for all this has been community.

        Unfortunately I had to flee the US (thanks Trump) so I’m taking things slow for the moment, but I have huge plans for the future

  • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I am sure there are some cryptologists here, soo… Nothing? Anyway, I know a bit about how RSA is inferior to eliptic-curve based schemes, and how security can be such a diverse and complicated topic than simple two-party communications.

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    9 days ago

    Um probably most people here know more about their work subject than the average Lemmy user

    For me it’s beekeeping and honey processing

    PS my other half did her degrees in speech/language therapy and psychology

  • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    I dunno the inner workings of Walmart? Been here for over a decade and I’ve held a few positions of authority within.

      • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        They used to. Most Walmarts now only sell a limited selection of shells, like 12 gauge, and some rifle cartridges meant mainly for hunting.

        Afaik, no store in the company sells actual firearms anymore. We have a selection of airsoft guns though.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          My Walmart sells guns. The one closest to my kid’s in Arkansas does too.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              LOL, I highly doubt that. Shopped guns in AR Walmarts. They only sell hunting-style kinda stuff. No pistols, nothing “scary”.

              (I’m probably missing the joke. 🙄)

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Depends on the community I guess. It’s not a red state thing as I’m in one and it’s hit or miss whether you’ll see guns in Walmart.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    Work: Chemical engineering, activated carbon (especially production), membrane filtration and high pressure boiler systems (shoutout @Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world).

    Non-work: Moonshine making, Festival organizing (quit two years ago), plumbing, carpentry and general home improvement.

    • GrantUsEyes@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      very interesting areas of expertise! Any interesting stories you have? Organizing a festival is such a huge undertaking.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Festival organizing is obviously a lot of work, even for smaller festivals like we did (think a big tent with 1500 guests and a few artists and dj’s). Since most of the work is done beforehand, we usually had it quite chill on the festival days. So we always took our times, hung out backstage with the artists and always had a buffet going there. Most artists loved being with us, because usually they would just get an assigned dressing room and a stage time. We loved doing this, because we got to hang out with the artists. So, amateur tip; if you organize a festival, hire bar personnel for the festival day and have a good time.

  • Bo7a@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    We live in a tiny house in the forest.

    my niche would probably be blue jay, chipmunk,and squirrel, behaviour. I spend a lot of time with a lot of forest animals. But those three consume about 80% of that time.

  • persona_non_gravitas@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    How is “average lemmy user” defined? I probably know more about eg. tea than the typical/median user. But there may be a true tea expert here that pushes the average up by a lot.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      How is “average lemmy user” defined?

      You do not define such things. You just listen to your own built-in average-o-meter.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s a good question. You probably know more about tea than the average Lemmy user and most Lemmy users. The fact that there may be one or two people who know more than you do does not disqualify either claim. But OP’s post description is basically about knowing more than any other Lemmy user — and that’s hard to say.

      I don’t think you could be better than any one other person at most things on, say, Reddit, but Lemmy is much smaller, and much more focused on certain areas. If you fall outside those areas, you likely have a few advantages in expertise. Tea being one of them as social media in general leans more toward coffee.