If someone were to record a flawless, 4K video of an actual alien walking around or a spaceship flying overhead, people would just think it’s a deep fake.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Supposedly the DOD and alphabet boys have pretty good video, and have gone around confiscating good videos. That family in Vegas that claimed that they had aliens in their back yard a few years ago, the one where the cops said they didn’t think it was a prank but wouldn’t go into detail as to why, got a visit from the alphabet gang not long after, and they had surveillance cameras that pointed into that yard.

    Now, as to whether those videos really do exist or if it’s a bunch of hokum, well, it’s going to have to be a case of maybe believe it when we see it. I’ve been following the UAP disclosure efforts with great interest, regardless of where they lead. I’ve always been a UFO/ET enthusiast, but I’m the type that wants to see proof, not “trust me bro, just look at these three pixels, my cousin said he fucked an ET in the army”. If we’re going to get proof, though, at this point we’re going to need more than video. That window’s been shut for a while, thanks to CGI, Photoshop, etc.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    As an alien I would now spend all my time targeting wannabe influencers. Wait until they are alone, get naked and let them take high-quality pictures and videos of my green ass while I dance and play yankee doodle on my harmonica

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve seen one myself, back in 2015. Flew right over me without a sound. Someone else on the ground saw it too and flashed an extremely bright beam at it and it responded back by flashing multi colored lights back. I took a picture of it and the only thing that showed up is a small blurry dot. But it was at night.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Actual, legit Fortean lore regarding this is that the phenomena knows when it’s being observed and photographed, and can manipulate time and space such that it doesn’t show up on digital photos.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Tbh, I think the big problem here is that a lot of ground-based sightings happen at night, likely due to a combination of

      1. Weird shit stands out more in the dark, but also

      2. It’s just flat out harder to identify stuff in the dark.

      Well, guess what doesn’t work as well in the dark? Cameras. As a rule of thumb, cameras almost always work better with more light than less light. It’s already difficult to get high quality pictures of stuff in the dark (depending on your camera, settings, lens, etc), now make it a very bright thing that’s potentially moving quick and at a significant distance, and any attempt to take a picture is cooked, especially with something like a cell phone camera. So, whether what you’re taking a picture of is the mother ship, Aurora, or a DJI drone, it all just kind of turns into a few bright pixels against a dark background. Then, you inevitably get the ends of the bell curve arguing whether it was an extra bright seagull or whether they could literally see the aliens waving at them in those two pixels, which is the death of any serious conversation about the presented evidence.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Plot twist: aliens introduced generative AI so people would dismiss evidence of their existence.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lets put it this way: in the 60s, a photo was not a simple or common thing. Only a few people had a camera at hand, and films could only take 20 to 30 pictures, so they were used sparingly. Still, many UFO pictures date from back then.

    Nowadays, everyone has a camera on person, and you can do thousands of pictures in a row. There are millions of recording video surveillance cameras everywhere. So if UFOs exist, there should be myriads of pictures and recordings, many of which in top notch quality, where you could read the labels on the little green mens console buttons.

    So far, they remain to be seen.

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Take a picture of a plane with your cellphone. Not to say that there are aliens in any way, but the devices we have can barely capture a decent picture in a grocery store security system. After 20/30 meters pretty much nothing is clear without specialized equipment.

    • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is a very reasonable explanation for this: If we are a topic of research for them, they could have simply stopped studying us in the same way

      Take our own science for example. We pull out of studies when the funding dries up. Maybe the aliens’ government grant ran out. Or, perhaps they have a policy of avoiding interference with the subjects. They could have changed methodology in response to the threat of high resolution recording equipment

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Nahh, any species able to come close to interstellar travel would be able to observe us from afar. We can already take good data on other planets’ atmospheres. It’s not going to be too much longer (probably still past our lifetimes, but) before we can take spy satellite quality photos of the surface.

        Sure, some alien species might prefer to be more hands-on, but I’d hope they’d also recognize the destructive power humans have and stay away; It’s a lot easier to break something than to invent it, and few things remain even recognizable after being hit by bigger military weapons. A lot of older movies/media relied on that fact to make the other thing seem so fantastically strong. Like the alien ship shrugging off a nuke in Independence Day.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The aliens are interested in bovine bowels, which are difficult to probe from afar.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That may be true, but there’s only so much you can collect by remote observation. I really like the “interstellar scientists” take, because it’s something I can see us doing. If we obtained warp drive, we would want to understand how other intelligent species develop, and how similar their conditions and course of development is to our own.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Does it really? You would think that in the times of social media and omnipresent cameras, aliens and UFOs should be omnipresent, if they existed.

        And please put warnings before YT links.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          UFOs should be omnipresent, if they existed.

          There are loads of sightings with videos. Take a look at r/ufo on reddit.

          Ufos certainly exist. It’s the Alien part that is crackpot.

          BTW. All my youtube links open with Newpipe 😉

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I were The Aliens, I would’ve stopped coming here somewhere around 2013-2014. And I don’t say this with any kind of undertone, I just feel we haven’t developed in significant ways over the past decade. They most certainly haven’t presented any social interest, so it’s a study. They’d only need vertical slices every half century to a century or so.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Tbh, if you’re advanced enough to have a working Alcubierre drive, slavery seems like it would be a waste of resources.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Honestly, I don’t think anyone in their right mind would risk it! We’re certifiably insane when in large masses, we’d ruin their civilisation if they’d get us all.

        We’d deffo see Bezos/Musk/Zuck/etc. becoming the Breens of our timeline, and we already hate’em!

        Edit: plus, why bother? It’s enough to cause a Pandemic, we’re aces at making things worse by ourselves! Planet cleans itself up, move in, adapt existing infrastructure, no risk of random nukes… sounds like a good deal to me!

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          i was thinking GOAULD, aside from a couple of the system lords(Osiris an YU evil as she was her lore in the show was wanting humans to literate , while her brother was seth was against it), most of them had impoverished slaves, ra even banned reading and writing, sound familiar to prevent the slaves turning against him on another planet.

          • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Good point, I guess it would be back to considering the permanence of The Cave allegory. I still have that gut feeling that humanity has a sort of in-built desire for freedom and self-determination which exists somewhere beyond the conceptual, something innate. Maybe its materialisation just takes a long enough timeline and that the species is offered relative stability in terms of genetics/psychological development (i.e. they don’t just outright lobotomise us and turn us into Servitors, or smth…)

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My guess is that the Earth is a petting zoo for some aliens. The adult aliens could come here to see how weird and stupid we are, while their children would give us some bitcoins to see if we do anything funny. What if some conspiracy theories, like the flat earth nonsense was a prank pulled by one of the visiting aliens?

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Now, now, let’s give ourselves fair share of the credit, we’re dumb enough to come up with Flat Earth on our own, tyvm!:)))

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Starting the anti-vaccine conspiracy would have been too cruel. I think any young punk would be grounded for a century for pulling that off.

          Instead, I’m pretty sure humans are the only species capable of such self destructive behavior and aliens can only gasp in horror as we throw ourselves into the fire.

          Also, climate change denial … oh, that’s just next level stupidity. No need to bring the doomlaser here. This species will be done sooner or even sooner. Maybe try planting a smarter species here next time around?

          • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Surely, if something/someone intentionally caused our existence, they must be pulling out clumps of hair at this point (or equivalent gestures).

            Although… well, this is purely speculative and quite a bit philosophical, but I guess it all comes down to how they’d manage fear and greed. I initially wanted to say that viciousness seems to be a facile trait for sentience, but I only have us as a sample, so…

            I genuinely don’t even know what to think anymore. My sense of scale and value has been completely shattered by our contemporary debasement with Fascism and burning the planet and everything in between and around, not in a million years could I have believed humanity in general could be so stupid as to do the same horrid shit all over again, and especially not after our forerunners’ fervency in purging the very concept of Fascism. Hell, maybe it was just Marketing…

            I mean, how can anyone consider a governing system so unabashedly inimical to life as a feasible way of doing things?! I… I just don’t understand it. I don’t know if I’m too stupid, or too naïve, or cloistered, or whatever the fuck else, but I just cannot process the idea of anything which looks like me behaving in such a horrid manner. I can grasp that capacity for violence, because I have it, too, but to use it in such a manner? No. That’s where my system hangs.

            • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Maybe humans are an experiment to see what happens if you combine infinite greed and selfishness in the same species. Sounds like a recipe for a total disaster, but it could be interesting to watch how the whole thing implodes at some point.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      That depends on your description of development. Socially, economically, etc we have reverted and are doing the same things that failed 100 years ago. But there have been breakthroughs elsewhere.

      Cas9 gene editing through CRISPR has opened a ton of incredibly valuable medical options around that time. The same with mRNA vaccination breakthroughs leading into the COVID era.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        These are noteworthy and relevant breakthroughs, yes, but I don’t see us doing anything dramatic with this technology in less than a decade, maybe two. And that’s just for something like regrowing teeth, way longer timeline for anything fancier. We’re still just basically optimising old tech right now. New battery designs incoming, solar panel tech is getting better (slowly), we are moving, yes. But it’s like watching people paint the living room at this point, and I assume long-distance space travel still isn’t “cheap” for them, even with their fancy manoeuvering.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or they took it as an opportunity to advance our technology enough to entertain us and stunt our growth. It’s like giving monkeys an endless supply of bananas, why would the monkeys do anything else any more? They got all the bananas and there’s nothing more to do for them.

      It’s an easy way to get rid of competition or an emerging civilization in the galactic neighborhood. Just throw us a bone and we’ll gnaw on it for a few thousand years.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’d need to come back and plant something else, because the side-effect of shortening attention spans has also increased the frequency at which we require new flavours of brainrot. I think this method of doing things is somewhat ineffectual.

        Honestly, if I were to guess how someone would stunt us, is to “help” us improve our industry before we even grasp its implications. It essentially created Baron-Gods (and we sure do like triangles and shit!) while ensuring that we’ll choke ourselves out.

  • makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure there was ever the possibility of a really convincing UFO video. I’d be skeptical of something extremely realistic even if we were still in the days before convincing traditional effects. It’s just too high a bar - it’s much easier to believe that a video was staged, even to an unbelievable level, than it is to believe that it depicts actual beings from another planet. I think that’s why the UFO community hangs their hat so much on Disclosure these days. They must realize that only confirmation from a trusted authority could be real confirmation.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      They must realize that only confirmation from a trusted authority could be real confirmation.

      This is a neat observation because it’s ironic on it’s face. UFO people actively work to discredit institutions and authority. But you’re right, they are desperate for confirmation from the Pentagon, the Vatican, even something on official DMV letterhead would be a blockbuster event in UFO/conspiracy spaces.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, I mean convincing to the public at large. Yeah I know I guy, otherwise perfectly smart, that is convinced that aliens are real based on the cheesiest, most obviously faked videos from back in the 80s or whatever.

  • recall519@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel like basic camouflage wouldn’t be difficult for a UFO. With more advanced camouflage, there’s no way we would know.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The new benchmark is the pentagon releasing the videos, with radar, and infrared, as well as testimonies to congress from people who are skeptical themselves.

    Seriously though, what the actual fuck are those UAP videos… It’s fucking wild.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        So i looked into the lens flare thing and I’m not so convinced.

        Here’s the kicker:

        The thing jammed radar.

        Multiple pilots VISUALLY saw it.

        It was confirmed to have descended 80,000 feet in less than a second, by both radar and a shipborne Aegis system, which prompted the pilots to take to the skies and check it out.

        The videos we see aren’t the most important pieces of evidence, it’s supporting evidence.

        Lens flare cannot explain the radar and aegis verification, and subsequent jamming, the visual confirmation, or the physics breaking performance characteristics.

        The thing went from hovering stationary, to beyond the speed of sound without creating a sonic boom.

        Anything made of meat would be liquefied by the inertia.

        There was no visual propulsion, or heat signatures from it.

        So, I reiterate, what the fuck is it?

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, people thought the pandemic we had going for years and the vaccines that controlled it were hoaxes. That the moon landings never happened and that Earth is flat. You are assuming the bar to close that window is way higher than it actually is.

    FWIW, sensible people would be more than capable of identifying that situation correctly. Mostly because one has to assume that an alien visit would be more diplomatic engagement and less playing peek-a-boo with an interstellar vehicle for no discernible reason.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The good news: if we heard tomorrow that astronomers had discovered an exoplanet with life, it would now sound plausible.