Nothing makes sense. It’s been oversimplified to the point where it’s been dumbed down to its core.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every iteration is designed to improve some metric so somebody can get promoted. It doesn’t matter if it ruins the overall experience, somebody’s pushing a metric.

  • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Do you mean Material Design? It’s getting a lot of hate, but for most apps, I actually really like it. On my computer, I would hate it and I don’t like the Gnome’s simplified design for example, but on my phone, I want most of the apps to be simple utilities and Material Design seems to fit that very well.

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point I wonder if they just do this shit to see how many people subscribe to it so they can laugh at our expense.

    As a contract software engineer that works with UI/UX designers across multiple industries and technologies, Google’s suggested UI/UX is typically not used.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    probably the same thing they’ve been doing to their old UX.

    letting engineers design it instead of hiring UX designers

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Engineers would be making it more complicated and customisable. I assure you no actual engineer has been anywhere near the UX in years

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        complicated, yes.

        customisable? yes but only in the so aggravating i’m gonna chunk it out the window sense.