• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok, you people angry about the first source are distracting from the obvious discussion.

    What the actual fuck?

    The problem isn’t that this could draw the US in. It will get drawn in, but not because of this.

    This is going to drag the entire region into war. Netanyahou is risking destruction of everything in the region if he does this. He doesn’t even care about the preservation of Israel at this point.

    This will end up being a weird as fuck world war, with no clear two sides.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why link Iran Front Page when there are international news sources?
    News not directly controlled by one of the belligerent parties is always preferable.

    • Dot.@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the article is licensed under free license (Creative Commons).

      As long as the source prove to have enough credibility, I would always link to the freely licensed version over less freely licensed sources.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, Iran Front Page is also international, it’s in English for a reason.

      That said, I don’t see how US sources, for example, would be more impartial than any other.