• flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    This isn’t competition, it sounds like the CCP heavily subsidises the manufacture, in an attempt to kill the American industry off.

    Thinking in decades or centuries is a very powerful tool!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This isn’t competition, it sounds like the CCP heavily subsidises the manufacture

      China: “Here, have a bunch of cheap electric vehicles to replace your aging fleet of ICE engines. Don’t worry, we’re picking up a part of the tab.”

      Americans: “What a great deal! We’ll buy them in droves.”

      State Government: “Not so fast! This wouldn’t be fair to honest, hard working domestic car companies like Tesla and Volvo and Toyota.”

      Thinking in decades or centuries is a very powerful tool!

      Shame we’re only capable of thinking about the next quarter’s profits.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s something very amusing about the nominally communist China beating the capitalist powerhouse USA at its own game.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Large professional centrally planned economies do a better job of managing scarce resources than a pack of ill-informed and uncoordinated Wall Street Lemmings.

          • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sometimes. And when they dont, there is no one to stop them. It’s the age old problem of a wise despot. Just dressed in different clothes.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s the age old problem of a wise despot.

              When you’re governing wisely, there is no need to be despotic. Conflicts and contradictions necessitate a large militant police state to keep the lower class in line. But when you’ve got generous surpluses and a rising quality of life, people are generally happy and easy to govern.

              • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Despot means you have absolute power. It doesn’t mean you use it badly. It just means you have the potential to.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Despot means you have absolute power.

                  Traditionally in a cruel or oppressive manner.

                  The wise leader doesn’t need to inflict cruelty, because they have the public’s trust.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US subsidizes their EV industry twice as much as China. The real why China can do this is because the US has gutted their industrial base in favor of financialization while China built up their industrial base.

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          No that’s just the US not being competitive because stock buy backs and layoffs are easier than building good cheap cars.

          • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            …or both. Think about it, if what you’ve said is completely true (I don’t disagree, BTW), why would they bother subsidising?

            They’re trying to ring fence the market. That the US is helping then is only vaguely related

            • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              But it’s not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.

              It’s like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.