• SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      No that’s just the US not being competitive because stock buy backs and layoffs are easier than building good cheap cars.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        …or both. Think about it, if what you’ve said is completely true (I don’t disagree, BTW), why would they bother subsidising?

        They’re trying to ring fence the market. That the US is helping then is only vaguely related

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          But it’s not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.

          It’s like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.