• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    I respect the work they were trying to do, but like… everyone was saying to GTFO of Haiti nearly a year ago. It’s not worth your life.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Haiti needs food, not Christian missionaries.

      These are tourists killed on vacation.

        • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Sounds great on paper but I’d have to know the details to give them any credit. Definitely heard of ‘Christian’ groups claiming to provide for 3rd world children that were outright fraud and\or actually abusive as fuck.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’ve seen some Christian run homeless shelters that are basically just there to proselytize… and I’ve seen ones that are irreligious in appearance and service and just funded by Christians. I detest the proselytizing just as much as any other devote agnostic, but I’d like more information before judging this orphanage either way.

            • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Christian run homeless shelters routinely make worship and unpaid labor mandatory if you want to stay there. Otherwise they kick you to the streets.

              Some even demand that you don’t seek employment (so they can exploit your unpaid labor indefinitely).

              • machinin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                6 months ago

                Some even demand that you don’t seek employment (so they can exploit your unpaid labor indefinitely).

                I’m gonna’ need a citation for that one.

                • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Happily: https://thebaffler.com/latest/between-a-rock-and-a-god-place-whitcomb

                  Once an individual is accepted, they must comply with all of the “house rules,” or “sacred covenant,” which hammer home the conditional nature of the charity on offer. In exchange for a bunk for thirty days, individuals are required to work without pay for six hours a day, six days a week. Jobs include working for various Mission business ventures and cleaning streets downtown—for which the Mission, but not the resident, is compensated. During this thirty-day period, residents are not permitted to look for outside work, which all but forecloses the hope of acquiring secure housing. For Dolores Nevin—who once went to the Mission with a torn rotator cuff and was turned away when she couldn’t work—disabilities that prevent you from “participating in daily Mission life” effectively bar you from staying there.

              • AmidFuror@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                6 months ago

                The place where I live requires unpaid labor too. I don’t get why Mom has such a problem with Doritos dust. Let it lie, I say!

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Absolutely 100% true for some, probably most, Christian run homeless shelters. Untrue for some (likely a minority) of homeless shelters. I’ve got no qualms about shitting on shitty Christians being asshats - I just have a problem generalizing this to everything.

      • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t agree with their religion and they shouldn’t have even been there. But to say that they were tourists is unfair. They were full-time missionaries. They (sadly) dedicated their lives to spreading their religion. They also probably tried to help meet basic needs like food, shelter, etc.

        Religion is complicated and this was a preventable tragedy.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I respect the work they were trying to do

      Why? They were missionaries. That’s not a good thing. Not saying they should be murdered of course but I think respect is really not what they deserve either.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t respect the work they were doing. Shoving the Bible down people’s throats isn’t a nobel cause.