• GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why did none of the other 45 countries on the Commission for Status of Women (CSW) put forth candidates? That’s not rhetorical, it’s an actual question. There’s obviously outrage and that’s understandable - Saudi Arabia is not a good guidepost for gender equality. It’s just strange that there were no other candidates and no dissent (and the article doesn’t give any explanation).

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a fairly passive aggressive way to put the spotlight on them.

      -Billy constantly disrupts the class by making inappropriate comments about girls.

      -Billy’s teacher decides to have a class discussion on the importance of a positive learning environment.

      -Billy’s teacher assigns Billy the task of researching all the reasons this is important and leading the discussion.

      -Billy is shamed into knocking it the hell off, but gets to feel important and heard.

      -Next time Billy acts inappropriately we are able to pull up his own talking points to remind him how to behave.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Billy is not a 11 year old boy. Billy is the hereditary monarch of a nation where they stone women for being accused of adultery. Billy can now claim to be an expert on feminism because Billy has been given legitimacy. Don’t be like Billy or the corrupt pieces of shit who gave him a seat at the table.

      • kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Getting Saudi Arabia to sign a commitment to human rights and take part in a women’s rights forum opens them up to political pressure that would not otherwise exist.

        The powerful nations will never let the UN be a supernational police agency. That doesn’t mean it has no value.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because this is a talk-shop, not a dictatorship? I’m not sure what the point of excluding them or even putting limits on their participation would be when they’re the ones that need to hear the conversation.

      I genuinely think the failure of the American education system to educate on what the UN actual is, is very deliberate and indeed successful.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re the ones that need to hear the conversation, but are they the ones to lead the conversation?

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Do you understand that a conversation is not a lecture? They are taking their turn in a rotating chair position. It would be weird if they didn’t.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Hearing a conversation and leading it are two very different things. I’d suggest avoiding stones when speaking from a glass house…

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I know what the UN is. They don’t pay taxes and park in handicap parking spots. One time I was blocked from going to a public park because some UN fuck was there. I keyed one of his Mercedes SUVs and proud of myself for doing it.