Intel Corp. is poised to announce plans this week to cut more than 20% of its staff, aiming to eliminate bureaucracy at the struggling chipmaker, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I’m hoping Arc survives all this?

    I know they want to focus, but no one’s going to want their future SoCs if the GPU part sucks or is nonexistent. Heck, it’s important for servers, eventually.

    Battlemage is good!

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Considering how badly Nvidia’s been pricing their dGPUs, the market’s ripe for a low cost alternative to fill a niche for years to come.

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Does Intel make its main CPUs in China for those high tariffs?

        Looked it up and found this info at least:

        Key US Locations:

        Arizona (Fab 52 and 62), New Mexico (Fab 9 and 11x), and Oregon (Hillsboro) are major Intel manufacturing hubs in the US, with the new Fab 42 and 32 also being part of a larger campus in Arizona. Ohio is also a major site with construction well underway for two new leading-edge chip factories.

        Global Footprint:

        Intel also has manufacturing facilities in locations like Israel (Jerusalem, Kiryat Gat) and Ireland (Leixlip).

        Expansion and Future:

        Intel is actively expanding its global network with new fabs in Ohio, Germany, and other locations, according to Intel Newsroom and plans to make the German fab one of the most advanced in the world.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Honestly, Intel has been up shit creek for a while now. No one big wants to use Intel’s fabs because they’re afraid that Intel’s design team will copy their homework.

      Vertical integration has fucked Intel. TSMC’s fabs get all the important contracts from Nvidia, Apple, etc. And the massive client volume allows them to accelerate the evolution of their fab tech.

      Intel needs to break their chip design business and fab into two separate businesses, otherwise it’s a continuation of the death march.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        AMD did that, but Global Foundry doesn’t do that well, at least compared to TSMC. Also Intel was going strong with their fabs until AMD started building better chips architecture wise. I’m just saying that splitting might not work.

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The Global Foundries split was probably a way to get AMD out of the hyper-capital-intensive fab business. And without a tier-1 customer, Global had less reason to pursue smaller nodes.

          Intel has that national-champion thing to keep it afloat. I can imagine there are defence contracts that will never go to a “TSMC Arizona Division” and they’ll pay whatever it takes to keep that going.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah for a long time there Intel was way ahead of the fabless AMD. Back then people were saying it was a mistake for AMD to split the fab business.

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It still could be a mistake in the long term, though. Imagine the wise US administration slapping 1,220,332% tariffs on Taiwan? Or China wreaking havoc there. I still think Intel could fare well with better leadership handling their fabs.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yeah, having fabs in the US as well as other countries could pay off yuuugely. If potential fab customers are truly afraid of Intel copying their designs - Intel could enter an agreement with say Qualcomm that it won’t design any ARM CPUs for X years. Surely there’s a market for US made SoCs once you can assemble the logic board of a smartphone in the US, and a smartphone from parts. You’d still import some parts but shift production to the US for what’s possible - but you need to start with the end product and work your way down because otherwise you’re shipping components back to China for final assembly. And the more expensive the components you can produce in the US, the less you’re affected by tariffs.

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No one wants to use their fabs because they’re bad!

        (Not awful, but not cutting edge really any more)

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      A lot of their chips are fab’d in the US and Israel and Germany and others though. It’s weird that nobody has mentioned all their US fabs. The new ones coming up in Ohio shortly (construction has been going already) will be two next-gen fab plants.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Suffering decades of imbeciles executive “leadership”

      They spent the R&D budgets on stock buy backs and now rely on federal government to pitch in for their capex.