• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is false. Before the ban RPAL holders could aquire certain handguns. They still had to keep them locked away 24/7 and inform the correct authorities if they ever moved it, like taking it to the range or changing apartments.

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Considering those grandfathered in is too broad for the discussion because at that point someone somewhere has one still, no matter what we’re talking about.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This ban still happened recently. There are lots of “legal” handgun owners who are not military/police. There is also the grandfathering of guns as well as certain exsecurity like brinks workers, and positions like game wardens in the MNR. All these employees still had to get their training and lisenceing just like anyone else through the same courses.

        • hazeydreams@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          It’s perfectly legal to own a handgun if you have an rpal.

          The ban is on transfering ownership, ie selling one or gifting them.

          So if you didn’t already own one and have it registered with the rcmp, before the ban on sale. You can’t legally get one.

          What you might find interesting is police aren’t required to get a PAL let alone an RPAL so technically police aren’t legal gun owners. (Obviously they are exempted from laws surrounding carrying/possessing restricted firearms due to working in a “lawful profession” but they don’t own the gun, and can’t purchase them unless they also get a PAL/RPAL on there own volition 20 b)