• IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    More reliable, less power draw than HDDs, faster and far more space efficient.

    Unless you are data hoarding random torrents, 6 to 12 TB is plenty.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      More reliable

      Heavily depends. If you want to use it as long-term cold storage you absolutely should not use SSDs, they’re losing data when left unpowered for too long. While HDDs are also not perfect in retaining data forever, they won’t fail as quickly when left on a shelf.

      • stetech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Good and true point, but arguably most NASs are built to be used, not to be not-used…

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Well, they arguably can also be used as one big long-term storage. Not sure who’d need to save so much data for a long time, but there surely will be at least some people who do and buy the “modern solution” over old HDDs thinking they’re better in general. As the “family backup” for example, or as cold storage solution in faculties that can be quickly accessed if needed.

          Read somewhere about a professor who used SSDs to “permanently” store important data on SSDs (perhaps in the comments of the article above) for a few years. Well, wasn’t that permanent…