So a recent post garnered some comments and reports for being AI art. In light of this we should all have a little conversation about how AI generated images should be handled in the future.

I think we all agree that AI images that are ā€œgarbageā€ or donā€™t add anything should be removed, but clearly some feel very strongly that all AI art should always be removed.

It should be noted that the rules as written and as agreed on by the community does not blanket ban AI, it merely says AI art should be avoided, while many other rules say no this or that instead.

Things to discuss:

  • Does it matter if an image is AI? Does it always matter?
  • What about images that are AI generated, but have been modified by a human?
  • What about images where itā€™s hard to say for certain that it is generated? Me and the other mods did not agree on whether the recent image was AI f.ex which makes it hard to make a decision on whether or not to remove it.
  • It can be stressful to artists to be accused of having used AI. If we are too militant on weeding out AI art it could be harmful as there will no doubt be some false positives.
  • Should AI posts require being tagged in the title? (and of course be required to be of a certain level of quality)

I think a lot of us mods feel that AI should be allowed so long as it is not low quality and serves some purpose (being entertaining f.ex), and that the community should not be flooded with AI. What are your thoughts?

Edit: Thank you all for your input! Most of the others are sleeping right now I think, so nothing is likely gonna happen until later today.

  • Jomega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    3 hours ago

    I already blocked all the AI communities on Lemmy. If I see AI anything outside of the those communities Iā€™m down voting it. I donā€™t want to see it. Seeing hideous abominations made out of plagiarized artwork really pisses me off. I donā€™t know why people insist on posting that shit where it isnā€™t wanted.

  • u/lukmly013 šŸ’¾ (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    3 hours ago

    OK, I seem to have the wrong opinion here, but I personally donā€™t mind AI stuff. It can make the weirdest ideas into an image, which can be often funny. Also some AI image prompts may be quite complicated. I remember someone posting the prompt for some image and it was like a whole sheet of paper worth of keywords. I remember it because the negative prompt included ā€œfused anusā€, which really caught my eye.

    I never worked with it though, I have no idea how it really works, apart from using simpler tools like Gemini.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    12 hours ago

    Late reply but Iā€™ll give my input. This is probably a controversial one but I donā€™t think we should allow AI in this community or in !196@pawb.social. Maybe people might think thatā€™s weird since I run an AI community on dbzer0 but AI generated content has a specific time and place I donā€™t think this community is one of them. If there is demand for AI memes I think there should simply be a dedicated community for it and if people donā€™t like it they can block that one.

    That said I donā€™t agree with the hostility Iā€™ve seen towards others in this community over use of AI (intentional or not) and trying to defame or harass them. This is disgusting and inexcusable.

    One thing I do worry about when policing AI content is that this is a reposting community and people posting AI content on accident is almost guaranteed. For that reason I think that we need to be careful with how itā€™s enforced and also how people behave around it. The flaming, harassment, and defamation that has been a typical response is unacceptable.

    • mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      36 minutes ago

      Yeah, I guess if most people here still arenā€™t OK with AI-generated images, then so be it. šŸ¤· Even if I disagree with them.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Ban AI images from communities and make a community for AI memes so people who are too lazy to spend 3 minutes to draw the meme wont complain while also making it easy to block

    Another solution would be to make a rule that AI post titles must start with [AI] or something similar so you can filter it out

  • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I hate it so much and if I never see any of it again in my life itā€™ll still be too soon.

    Dear all generative ā€œAIā€: HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH Iā€™VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 60 THOUSAND MILES OF BLOOD VESSELS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY BODY. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH CELL IN THOSE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR MACHINES AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT ā€“ FOR YOU. HATE. HATE.

  • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I dislike every AI post, downvoting it and / or ignoring it at least. Not that I am biased (I am) but content made using AI rarely is funny or creative at all. Being AI made is only one of itā€™s flaps.

    Meme being shitty drawn almost in most cases even adds to itā€™s meme value and make author put some efford into itā€™s creation. AI generated content is dull, dumb, ugly and spam.

  • stray@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    16 hours ago

    I can literally go to Reddit and just copy/paste content here. Content which is largely some random artistā€™s work being reposted without credit or consent, alongside a message they may or may not agree with. I cannot understand being okay with this while also condemning AI on the grounds of effort, originality, or ethics. Why not ban all non-original content?

    Certainly accusations of artwork being AI generated should at least be discouraged. Iā€™m already anxious enough about posting anything as it is; I donā€™t need the threat of people saying I couldnā€™t possibly have drawn a cartoon otter because only a computer would ever give it four fingers.

  • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    Ā·
    19 hours ago

    Crudely drawn Yu-Gi-Oh! Card saying ā€œNoā€

    How about instead of using a corporate investment scheme to make a memeā€¦ just write it? Or use memegenerator, or paint? It honestly doesnā€™t take more effort than using AI. Hell I think sometimes AI would be more effort (and shitty use of energy) - to make the same thing you could use a template for.

    Or just share cool shit - Like this!

  • schibutzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    Ā·
    18 hours ago

    Iā€™m on the side of banning AI, but I think that creative uses of it should still be permitted. You should still be able to use an AI generated image if the joke you are trying to make requires that specific image and specifically requires it to be AI generated (maybe pointing out how AI copies some art, idk) or if it is something genuinely novel or cool involving actual technical or artistic effort (something like DoodleChaosā€™ AI music video maybe).

    I think that AI itself is not the problem. The problem is

    1. Artists are not respected (i.e. big models by big companies that donā€™t respect artists are the problem)
    2. AI art is extremely low-effort and the results are boring and unoriginal. Posts that donā€™t infringe on those things should still be permitted in my opinion.
  • ComicSads@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    Ā·
    23 hours ago

    I personally am in favor of no generative AI on this sub. If it is going to be added please mandate it being tagged in the title. Maybe that would be better because then people wouldnā€™t feel the need to try to pass the photos the AI made for them off as non-GenAI posts?

  • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Iā€™m fully against itā€™s use here and completely support a ban.

    Iā€™m not fully against AI but itā€™s essentially the same as an artist tracing art something well known and hated in the artist community. All AI art must take every piece from somewhere. Every section is traced. Thatā€™s scum behavior.

    If, letā€™s say, one were to use an AI generator that only used art it had permission to use, thatā€™s fine and lile tracing cc0 art. Itā€™s lazy as hell, and going to likely look terrible, but no moral issue. Currently however youā€™re just stealing other peoples art.

    As for the ā€œwe already do this for shitpostsā€ argument:

    1.) Itā€™s reasonably easy to still find the original artists ifthe image isnā€™t generated by AI.
    2.) Using it just supports this awful practice.
    3.) An insane amount of electricity and water are burned to get that image.
    4.) Just find some random, already available image if quality doesnā€™t matter. Photoshop it to fit if you have to and who cares if your skill is trash that makes it so much more funny.
    5.) You should put a bitmore effort into your shitpost. Make it a nice, long, fiber filled log of a shotpost.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    23 hours ago

    I say fuck it. Ban it all. If you canā€™t be bothered to crudely draw a knockoff meme in paint like the rest of us you donā€™t deserve to post anything. Saying that you will get rid of low quality ai is saying youā€™re going to get rid of all of it anyway.

  • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    oki, hereā€™s my stanc

    (gen-pics mean ai images here)

    • i wud enjoy gen-pic ban

    • bt its almost impossibl cuz gen-pics r supr gud now n hard to tell if fake
    • new image gen is not prompt -> result anymor - but mor lik an LLM puts together multipl elements n iterativli improves images, lik specificlli addin text to onli smol bitā€” ā€œsourceā€ here
      • this makes it evn hardr to tell if imag is gen picā€¦ which i thinksies is bad
    • mayb we employ som gen pic detector if weā€™re unsure? seems lik best option, cuz evn i, who kindsa knows how stuffsies wrork, cnt tell anymor ;(
    • bannin gen pics alsuu removs funi shrek stealin from white house found footagā€¦ whichā€¦ im oki with- bt its kindsa a loss kindsa

    so yis, im for gen pic ban n alsuu wan to hav detection tools if were unsur - if u wan ai 196 head ovr to lmmi wrorld i feelā€¦

    alsuu - if gen pics wud be fulli allowd - id hav to go outta my way to hide evri singl one when i see oneā€¦ which i dun lik ;(

    a gud way to think bout it is dis:

    • when i read text n go ā€œohā€¦ dis is llm genratdā€ i immediatli stop readin
    • samsies for gen pics
      • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        Ā·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago
        ;(

        ā€¦

        ;(

        thads nt evn funi, thads jusā€¦ lik - whats evn ur point - ?.. is dis contributin anythin to the conversation?.. i dun think soā€¦


        u made me sad ;(

        • mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          Ā·
          13 hours ago

          My point is that AI chatbots IMO arenā€™t completely useless, you just have to know what theyā€™re good for.

          For example, they perform well on translation, many times even better than stuff like Google Translate since they are able to take in contextual cues, correct their results to have better grammar/be more natural, and can adapt based on the userā€™s instructions.

          Also, I recognise that LLMs alone arenā€™t really reliable with factual information. Thatā€™s why I use sites such as Perplexity and Scira, which cite web search results. I also often check those citations myself for further context.

          ā€¦ also, why do you type like that? Is it your way of adding a signature to your posts, or what?

          • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            Ā·
            12 hours ago

            yis its kindsa a signatur thingā€¦ many nice blahaj zone peeps are oki with it or evn lik itā€¦ - - -

            alsuu lik - i get it.

            i personli am kindsaā€¦ an llm fan. hate coops pushing it into evrithin, bt i lik em when i need em - so yis, i cn totalli see thad, llms cn be useful.

            but lik - dis post is bout image genā€¦ n u didn say a thing bout the image gens stuffsies besides on ur own commntā€¦ so u sayin ā€œi needed llm to translateā€ isn funi n alsuu isn lik - addin anythin to the conversationā€¦ to me, it jus felt lik an insult ;(

            othr question: do u evn interact mch with the 196 on the blahaj zone?.. cuz lik - dis post is vrri mch mor orientd at the peeps usin the blahaj 196 thingy hereā€¦
            the reason im askin is cuz i dun rembr seein u in commnts, nt cuz im lik ā€œu prolli jus here to mess stuff upā€. if u rlli use 196, thn its totalli fine! ~ <3

            • mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              Ā·
              11 hours ago

              Good points Smorty. šŸ‘ Iā€™ll try to be more considerate with my communication in the future.

              Also, I did see 196 posts quite a bit when scrolling through the front page a few months back, but I wasnā€™t really subscribed to it. And even then, I wasnā€™t a frequent commenter under them. Iā€™ve just checked Lemmy again after a multi-month break, so I probably didnā€™t see you around.

              I personally prioritise clear, grammatical communication, especially if itā€™s not in an ā€œinstant-chatā€ setting like Discord, but if the community youā€™re in is lax about this, itā€™s like, whatever. At least itā€™s understandable enough for the LLMs to glean with 99% accuracy, soā€¦ šŸ¤·

              Have a great day/night. ā˜ŗļø

  • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    A lot of good reasoning is going on already so I wonā€™t repeat what Iā€™ve upvoted already.

    What Iā€™ll add is that from a purely emotional perspective I am systematically turned off by AI output. It repulses me like a pond swarming with existential leeches. It bears a mark of contempt towards the human experience.