• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Reminder that you don’t need to use iCloud backup; local backups still work fine and are encrypted.

    • evilcultist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s just the backups. Apple’s site says it’s things “such as” wallet, notes, photos, documents, bookmarks, reminders, voice memos, shortcuts, messages backup, and device backup. The such as seems to imply there’s more.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      tbh if the government demanded fediverse servers do this then they’ll probably comply as well, I really don’t think this is apple’s fault as much as i hate them and every similar tech megacorps

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Bur what about servers that are not based in the UK? They are not officiallly doing business there, they just happen to be accessible from there. And with Fediverse, you can specifically choose a server that suits your jurisdiction needs.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I kind of think going no encryption is arguably better than agreeing to a backdoor, since it should make it clear to consumers that they can’t trust it as safe and should probably use an alternative that would be more secure. I don’t know how many trustworthy alternatives really exist on iOS, though, not least because Apple has allegedly used their position to discourage competitors to iCloud.

  • Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    A better title would be “Apple helps the US government bypass the 4th amendment”.

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah we don’t have enough American news, we should start reframing other countries’ news into how it affects America

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It affects certain people from America. I have a relative who is directly affected by this.

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The UK is part of 5 Eyes. They swap info on citizens among members. No warrants, no constitutional protections. All they have to do is ask MI5 for info on Americans with dual citizenship.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          That stretch of logic sounds an awful lot, like a post-hoc justification after learning it wasn’t about the US. But ok

          • Geodad@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            One of my in-laws has dual England/US citizenship. They divide their time between the two countries. It directly effects them.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I don’t doubt that. But its still a large stretch, to think the UK passed a law applying to all UK citizens, specifically to give the US access to a few thousand dual citizens.

              I’m thinking LoudWaterHombre was right. You simply have an extremely US centric mindset.

              • Geodad@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Apple is a US based company. For them to just roll over sets a bad precedent, especially for our fascists who are now running the show here.

                What’s to stop the US government from going after the same services here? What’s about Tor or VPN services?

                The authoritarians will smell blood in the water after this. Since the big player just gave up, who will stand in their way?

            • Geodad@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              No, the only thing I wish would center around the US is an asteroid. I absolutely hate it here, but I don’t have the means to leave.

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        No, but they’re part of 5 Eyes. The US government can ask MI5 to spy on US citizens, which gets around 4th amendment protections.

        This will allow them to spy on any US citizens with dual citizenship.

          • Geodad@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Not if they are in the UK? Idk, that’s probably a weird edge case, but unless we’re all free, nobody is.