• Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Watching the Biden admin is wild. At one minute he’ll be escalating the wars in the Ukraine and Palestine, but the next he’ll be funding the NLRB and addressing the housing crisis in a way that improves walk-ability.

    It’s like, he has two settings: “actually useful moderate” and “KILLKILLKILLKILL”

    Unfortunately, this makes him the best US president since carter

    desolate

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like how this is finally acknowledging WFH as something that is here to stay but I’m not sure I understand the connection with the housing crisis. From the article:

    New York’s famous Flatiron Building will soon be converted from empty offices into luxury residences

    Luxury apartments in premium locations is the first thing I would think of too if I were a developer, but their target buyers don’t sound like the sort of people who currently suffer from the housing crisis. But maybe I’m wrong and there will also be developers converting less prestigious office space into affordable housing…

    The other thing I don’t get is this: I don’t know Manhattan but I did work in some (I assume) similar business hubs in the middle of overpriced cities and I wonder: are many people going to want to live in expensive converted office spaces if they don’t work near there any longer? I mean if they were given the chance to WFH from anywhere would they still choose Manhattan? Honest question and maybe the answer is yes, because of the restaurants, culture, good schools or whatever… I would personally make different life choices if I could work completely remote, though.

    • David_Eight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      uxury apartments in premium locations is the first thing I would think of too if I were a developer, but their target buyers don’t sound like the sort of people who currently suffer from the housing crisis.

      It’ll have a domino effect, more apartments in Manhattan means less people in Brooklyn, Queens, etc. meaning prices go down in the latter boroughs. I live in Jersey City across the Hudson from Manhattan and a large part of the residents here are just people who can’t afford to live in Manhattan.

      are many people going to want to live in expensive converted office spaces if they don’t work near there any longer?

      Yes, I used to live in a converted office building in Newark NJ (not far from Manhattan) and really loved it. And yes people will always want to live in NYC and especially Manhattan. Many people, myself included simply prefer living in cities. I’ve also looked for apartments in Manhattan and it’s completely different than anywhere else.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I remember watching the SOHO lofts get built sitting in 78e traffic towards Hoboken every morning.

        It seemed to me as if it was an old industrial revolution styled office building or warehouse being converted into apartments.

        I hope to see more of that in the future

  • HowMany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How about… let those corporations EAT those fucking buildings and let’s put that money to use IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE. First time home buyers. Put some federal controls on real estate; mortgage rates; put the skids on the goddam prime rate - there is NO need for that shit… the economy is suffering from PROFITEERING - NOT inflation.

    I realize half or more of our elected officials will have to give back bribe money in order to do something for the people that doesn’t doubly do something for their wealthy sponsors.

    I know, I know… “just get to earth?”

      • HowMany@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They belong to corporations. The corporations don’t get tax breaks if the buildings aren’t used - but they still need to be paid for… which is a huge monetary outlay. Honestly, I don’t care what happens to them and neither should anyone else. Am I sorry that corporations, the SAME corporations fleecing the planet right now with profiteering, are losing money? Hardly. They made the rules - they bought the politicians to enforce the rules- they made their own mess.

        Converting office space to living space strains infrastructure in ways not intended by the original intent of the buildings. They can’t put thirty apartments on a single floor of a high rise and have those residents use the same four bathrooms per floor that the offices had. Same with sewage. Same with electrical.

        And I reiterate - as soon as the money is distributed to the “developers” - that money - OUR money - is gone… whether it is used for the purpose intended or not.

        Keep in mind that trump is a ‘developer’. Do you really think if Biden gave trump “three billion dollars” that trump would use it for what it was intended? Or do you think he’d pocket most of it? And he is a typical ‘developer’ as far as ‘honesty’ is concerned.

        • cobra89@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Corporations already do hold onto buildings without using them. Because typically real estate goes up in value, especially when there’s scarcity, which there will be if corporations are holding property. This isn’t the solution you think it is.

          • HowMany@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Corporations already do hold onto buildings without using them.

            I don’t think you understand real estate holdings of that nature. Thanks for the response though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Converting office space to living space strains infrastructure in ways not intended by the original intent of the buildings. They can’t put thirty apartments on a single floor of a high rise and have those residents use the same four bathrooms per floor that the offices had. Same with sewage. Same with electrical.

          Water and sewage is a real question, that’s true. From the projects like this that I’m aware of, fire safety is actually the bigger issue, though. Usually sleeping areas are required to have an easier escape route than would be typical in the middle of a big office building. I guess you can add pipes and pumps without too much modification, and offices use plenty of electricity, although probably not in the same pattern.

          As for the systemic issues, governments do manage to get things done sometimes. The exact details of such a legislation are more granular than I really would want to hammer out on Lemmy.

          • HowMany@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would think a commitment to intelligent solutions such as converting unused warehouse spaces rather than sticking billions of dollars down the “developer” black hole (trump is a “developer”… did you know that? Yeah, that criminal guy - he’s kind of the cream of the crop).

            So while government considers once again giving huge handouts to rich property owners does sound appealing, it’s not really.

            I would venture a guess that 10% of the “bailout” cash might get used towards… something related to conversion. And that would be that.

            How about we NOT bail our some stranded ass rich assholes with our tax dollars and use those dollars wisely - towards fixing the problem rather than making another tax dollar hog trough.

  • Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    There are 16,000,000 empty homes and 500,000 homeless. Office buildings aren’t going to be solving any real problem other than the people who own the building being shit out of luck