Carbon capture is useful for making aviation fuel, and hopefully eventually plastic. But I’m guessing these people were suggesting carbon capture from polluting power plants?

Or use a laptop with a GPU? An npu seems to just be slightly upgraded onboard graphics.

I’m familiar with the BBC, but I don’t know about their Russian service. Is it the same coverage, or an independent branch? I’ve seen articles by the investigator I think, but same thing, is this their Russian branch? I’ve never heard of the first one.

Really? How fast is the memory bus compared to x86? And did they just double the bus bandwidth by doubling the memory?

I’m dubious because they only now went to 16gb ram as base, which has been standard on x86 for almost a decade.

So which ones are those two? I’m not familiar with them.

But you can accelerate nural nets better with a GPU, right? They’ve got a lot more parallel matrix multiplication compute than any npu you can slap on a CPU.

That’s really trippy! Great work

Meaning one’s that didn’t agree with Russia’s official stance, or ones claiming to be independent but still funded by Russia? Those would be very different things.

Hypergolic oxidizer, dinitrogen tetroxide, one of the most carcinogenic substances known to man.

SpaceX engineers are overworked, but not really underpaid compared to the industry. But they should probably be paid more given the workload and hours.

Poor thing starved to death

Seems silly to try to get the CPU to do GPU stuff, just upgrade the GPU.

Matrix multiplication is also largely what graphics cards do, I wonder how the npus are different.

What’s the diameter? Starship is 9m, but it looks like this one is smaller? Also, what material are they using? If it’s stainless, why paint it?

We need ranked choice voting so people can vote for who they actually want without throwing away they vote. The problem is opposing ranked choice voting is one of very few issues both parties agree on, since it hurts both of them.

Don’t worry, that rocket is new shepherd, so you can eat him when it comes back down in 30 min. New shepherd doesn’t get to orbit, it just does 100km hops straight up.

And it’s hard to tell what the difference is. Apples ‘built from the ground up for AI’ chips just have more RAM. What’s the difference with CPUs? Do they just have more onboard graphics processing that can also be used for matrix multiplication?

You’re saying it was not targeted at combatants, or that there was a lot of collateral damage?

Crimea would be realistic if the US didn’t hold back with their aid.

With how small feature sizes are on chips, I wonder what sort of easter eggs the designer have hidden in them.