• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If they didn’t veto it what would happen? Is there an article like NATO that would stipulate that the UN counties would go to war… I didn’t think there was. So I am unsure if would have any change.

      • Muehe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Resolutions made by the UN security council (which this would have been) can be enforced through the UN peacekeeping mission (aka the blue helmets) by stationing UN troops along the contact line to prevent hostilities from resuming. This has had mixed success in the past, there is actually a peacekeeping mission stationed right now on the Israel/Lebanon border which hasn’t prevented either side from shooting at each other after the October 7 attack.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s good to know. So does that just require a majority vote? (Which if this wasn’t vetoed would have been a landslide). Or does it require some other percentage?

          • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            UN general assembly majority vote, but security council, the permanent members all need to agree as even one nay is a veto.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              So that would mean if the U.S. eventually doesn’t veto it, Russia might as it has clearly been to their benefit.

              What a stupid world we live in.