Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 4 months ago

Music Monday - what have you been listening to?

5

12

Music Monday - what have you been listening to?

Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 4 months ago

5

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

iii@mander.xyz
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
2·
4 months ago
Into Strauss these last two weeks.
Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
4 months ago
A bit of Onmyo-za, plus the same stuff I hear often (Black Sabbath, Pink Floyd, Kayah, random vaneras, EngHaw…)
flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
4 months ago
Some cringy Christmas music 😅

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbgCFy8YR7E
LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
4 months ago
deleted by creator
Elaine Cortez@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
4 months ago
Phoenix - If I Ever Feel Better (Todd Edwards Dub Better Mix)

#Far2faded - SEAPUNK MIXTAPE

Squarehead, “Someday”

CrystalFissure’s Music - #43 - The Grooov

Squarehead - Elegante (Original Mix)
Whateley@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
4 months ago
A lot of classic black metal and Wisp.

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !casualconversation@lemm.ee

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

379 users / day
1.17K users / week
3.25K users / month
8.42K users / 6 months
2 local subscribers
3.17K subscribers
934 Posts
21.4K Comments
Modlog