• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a good precedent.

    I know if I was a sitting President and the courts told me I could never be held liable for ANY CRIME I committed while in office my hesitation for extreme acts would be at least a little lessened. The courts would essentially be saying the President can do whatever he can manage to accomplish, legal or not. Which is essentially handing dictatorial powers to the President.

    • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      It would give the president the legal authority to assassinate political rivals including Supreme Court justices. Hopefully even our currently corrupt SC understands that granting absolute power to any one person is a horrible idea.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. He doesn’t even need to kill anyone. He could simply have all his political rivals arrested for crimes. He could even just have them be the crimes they have committed that aren’t normally enforced. Like the SCOTUS not declaring their gifts, improper congress procedures (gun procedures), insider trading, etc. Then if they are all in jail awaiting trial, they can’t do their jobs. Repeat until he has a Congress to approve removing them and appointing new justices.

        It’s an insane thing to agree with so I’m glad the courts understand that.