• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 days ago

    Mostly accurate, except maybe the phone. Kids (10yo as shown by the meme) having phones was much less common.

    '95 kids may have had these later on as they went into highschool especially when there parents started getting early smartphones and handing down their Razr. But in 2005? Very rare.

    • I was born in '92. Didn’t get my first phone til I was 14 in 2006. It was a Kyocera Oystr. Then in 2009 I had a Moto RAZR ve20. Most of the kids I knew called it a RAZR 1½. Loved that phone. It had a 3.5mm jack that worked with regular headphones so I put all my music on it and never asked for an iPod. It was sick that it had music controls on the back of the clamshell.

      I didn’t get my first smartphone until 2011, and I had to pay for it myself. It was a US Cellular variant of the Moto Photon 4G called the Electrify. It had this sick CRT animation when you locked the screen. Motorola made some kickass smartphones in the day.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Honestly if they’d update their freaking phones in a timely and long-term manner I’d say Moto still makes great phones.

    • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Probably varies a lot based on where you grew up. I got my first phone when I was 9, in 2006, and was among the last in my class to get one. Though phone plans were really cheap by then in Finland, partially due to the largest phone manufacturer (back then) Nokia being Finnish, and our telecom operators being in tight competition. (We’ve three separate carriers with country wide networks, as was the case back in the early 2000’s as well)

      I’d say the turning point here was 2003 when Nokia launched the model 1100, which was dirt cheap. I vaguely remember the price eventually falling as low as 19 € in a sale, at which point the phone cost about the same as your typical phone plan per month.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Probably. I was born closer to the millennium and in the US. I don’t remember my peers having phones until at least middle school (11-14 years old)

        Teens definitely had them. But elementary school kids no. Not like now for sure. Maybe a few did but (if I recall, obviously I wasn’t paying bills then) US phone plans were quite expensive with many paying PER TEXT SENT. So for the kids that did have them probably couldn’t do much but call, so I never saw them taking them out or anything during class.

        It wasn’t uncommon for kids to play around with old PDAs or phones, but no active service so more a camera/shitty games.

        Then again maybe I just didn’t go to the higher income schools lmao.

        • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Per text and per minute plans were the norm at least here for a long time, I had one until mid 2010’s IIRC. A single text cost something like 0.069 €. Parents kept their kids from overspending with prepaid plans, which were the norm for elementary students. In Europe people typically don’t pay to receive calls, so your parents could still call you even if you ran out of phone credits.

          We got unlimited data plans before widespread unlimited texting, which meant people mostly stopped texting by early 2010’s. I remember my phone plan getting unlimited 3g in 2010 for 0.99 €/month (approx 1.40 $ back then), albeit slow AF (256 kbps). Most switched to e.g. Kik or later WhatsApp after that.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      My siblings shared a phone for a while that was basically to call when we needed to be picked up. I think I was driving before I got my own phone.