Relevant post: https://slrpnk.net/post/1480928

Also I ask that y’all refrain from downvoting opposing opinions in this thread. In this case, I think dialogue is more useful than downvotes.

  • _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably not, I’d likely stick with condoms. Any male contraceptive medication would be too new to have any clear idea of whether it was safe. Even for women’s contraceptives that have been around for decades, there are a ton of potential side effects and risks.

  • Endomlik@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They can steal part of my dick when I’m a baby but we still don’t have ball valves? Just give me ball valves.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Personally no

    I like the trustworthyness of a condom

    When it has an issue of effectiveness you usually can tell pretty quick

    Whereas medication (at least in my experience) can suddenly stop being as effective due to your body building a tolerance, something you ate, an allergy forming that wasn’t there before, etc.

  • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As comfortable as I’d be with a woman taking contraceptives. None are completely safe and there haven’t been nearly enough studies on their effects (particularly the mental health implications).

    Just because there hasn’t been enough study on men’s birth control, doesn’t mean we put the burden of contraceptives on women alone.

  • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think calling it male contraception would make it weird for me because i am not male/a man. Still, I would have definitely used in the past, but know i dont need it any more.

    • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why is that?

      As the word male most commonly refers to those who produce motile gametes, which is what such a product seeks to impede in some way, semantically it is quite aptly named.

      I take that, given that you mention it would have been useful in the past, that your gamete production facilities have been damaged in some way and you are still coming to terms with that?

  • spaduf@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A male contraceptive medication would have to work through a fundamentally different mechanism than female birth control, requiring changes to sperm or sperm production. I myself would be extremely skeptical until it had been on the market for a long period of time. This is less a skepticism of science and more of a skepticism of the pharmaceutical industry (particularly in the states).

    Edit: After looking into the mechanisms of the up and coming methods (primarily hormonal) that have been in the news I think my conclusion was a little hasty. I think long term risks are likely very low or at least comparable to women’s birth control.