(not sure if this is the right community, sorry)

Hi, someone posted this on another server. I’d like to request we defederate with rammy.site and exploding-heads.com as well. I scrolled through some of their posts and comments and it’s full of ridiculous anti-left propaganda, for example a post where some liberal Florida family fleeing the state when some child protection laws got passed, implying liberals abuse children and won’t live in a state that doesn’t allow them to. Just take a look for yourself.

" Admins of Lemmy.ml please consider defederating from rammy.site it has been taken over by right wing malicious actors from exploding-heads.com and the admin is nowhere to be found.

It is imperative that you take action as soon as possible the users on rammy are using the site to spread their messages to a further audience, we must nip this in the bud. If you don’t believe me check the instance for yourself, you’ll see it dominated with bigoted right wing posts and spam communities."

Edit: So many commenters think this is about political opinions or disagreement. It’s not. If I said “Mixing bleach and ammonia is good for you” I bet some of you would call that a political disagreement.

  • why@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imo deferderating should be a last resort. And so far I haven’t seen any excessive cases of people coming over and breaking the rules of this instance.

  • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not in favor of defederating over political preference at all. I don’t come to this instance expecting an echo chamber, and an echo chamber is precisely what I do not want.

    • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not political difference, it’s disinformation and propaganda. Just look, even if you’re conservative you should be able to see how messed up it is unless you lack critical thinking skills

  • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please don’t! The whole reason I made an account here is because they don’t defederate. I want to control what I read. If you have a problem with a certain instance or user, block them yourself! It’s very easy.

    I don’t want to have to spin up a whole instance just for myself.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I decided to see for myself so I could voice an informed opinion. One of the first posts I saw on their (EH) Local channel, titled Based Pride Month, is an image of a headline reading, Saudi Arabia Celebrate Pride Month by Hanging Gays with Rainbow Noose. This is hateful content. My ability to discern such has nothing to do with savvy. I don’t want to see these opinions because they are grotesque.

      However, I haven’t seen ExHeads leaking out into the greater Lemmiverse. That said, I want nothing to do with anyone who considers this ok. Even if they are currently fairly contained, they have made it clear who they are and I choose not to surround myself with bigots.

      I vote to defederate. We don’t need to wait for them to become a huge pain in the ass. They are showing us who they are.

  • Shredder@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I joined this instance because it doesn’t block/ defederate. Everyone can pick what they want to see cutting it off is stupid.

        • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did read the FAQ before asking this, I did not take it to mean it’s a policy of the server not to defederate.

          • Jour@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            https://sdf.org/?tutorials/social_network

            SDF - The Ethical Social Network What ‘Social Network’ means to us (a history lesson)

            …To the users of the SDF Public Access UNIX System, ‘SDF Social’ is based on the concepts and principles of the early Social Networks that we have always been a part of and not the highly commercialized, for-profit and ethically questionable Social Networks of the late 1990s and 2000s.

            Simply put, SDF has always been about Collaboration, Non-Commercialism, Choice and Privacy.

            Choice is very important here. Anyway best of luck in your endeavour whatever it is.

            Also in the IRC section there’s something about “Common sense” it’s a great read. Just saying. Best regards.

  • Jour@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I seriously doubt sdf.org will defederate due to political, religious or other kind of views unless some kind of danger to its users is involved, and even then I’m pretty sure we would go to ARPA votes over it. While the instance might be recent the community behind sdf.org is ancient (I say this with my utmost respect for them ) so yea, not their first rodeo or last one. If you don’t like the views of those instances feel free to block them yourself. Best regards.

      • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe because of the literal content of your post?

        I scrolled through some of their posts and comments and it’s full of ridiculous anti-left propaganda, for example a post where some liberal Florida family fleeing the state when some child protection laws got passed, implying liberals abuse children and won’t live in a state that doesn’t allow them to.

        I’ve got news for you: the entire planet has not taken up American political idiocy. Nobody outside of the USA (and many of the people in it) gives a fuck about American political slapfights.

        If you want a safe space instance for one or another American “team,” find it somewhere else or start one yourself.

  • funchords@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I am reading the situation wrong, I apologize.

    The reason that I am not a member at beehaw was because they were overly wrapped up in concerns such as this one. I’m here for enjoyable chats with people, not to take sides in the latest macro-politics or causes or whatever lately is stirring the pot or making the winds blow. These things are fine and some people are interested in them, but I’m turned off by the idea of an instance that is particularly identified one way or another when I am not concerned with any of that.

    What I’m looking for are kind souls that share an interest in technology and an instance that was widely federated so that a wide variety of my interest groups (music, weightloss, networking, ancient Stoicism) are available. That’s why I joined here. SDF has been around a long time and many who have enjoyed its offerings have held many different opinions and yet shared this resource peacefully.

    I’m particularly turned off by people that want a silo with only the right causes, only the right thinking, only the right speech.

    That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have management and protection of against those that are unkindly trolling or actively trying to do technical damage. Ban those actually doing evil. But if people of good cheer share different views kindky as neighbors and friends, I have no problem with that and don’t want to see that roped off.

    Remember the two rules of FidoNet? “Don’t be excessively annoying. Don’t be easily annoyed.” That’s all I’m saying.

    • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re reading the situation wrong. Go to those instances and read what’s there, it’s not about free speech, it’s active disinformation campaigns and propaganda. I would feel the same if it was extreme leftist propaganda. It’s not about creating an echo chamber. I respect the right to free speech, but that isn’t the same as allowing people a platform to systematically organize hate using falsified information. This is a situation where silence is complicity. Their instance continues to exist without us, their free speech continues, but by remaining federated we are giving them a platform.

      • funchords@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As usual, I have typed 500 words when 50 will do, and for that I apologize.

        Go to those instances and read what’s there

        No, I do not care to and why would you do that? You already have determined it’s not right for you. Any alleged content problem that you have to see by going there would, if true, be a problem there. Does that make it a problem here? If I have to take extraordinary steps here to see it here, isn’t that on me? Isn’t the apparatus doing what it is supposed to be doing if I seek out a thing and find it?

        The ultimate measure of freedom is the freedom to abstain. (Nobody is forcibly opting us in to reading their content.)

        I’m just a regular user of SDF so these things aren’t up to me, but I would think that it would take more than “because it exists.” Defederation and Federation shouldn’t be used to signal alignment and nonalignment of expression, but for reasons of managing the network itself. A telephone company provides service to everyone and doesn’t care what you do with your phone. But, if someone is using it in a way that disrupts the network itself or others’ ability to use the network, the telephone company should act to protect the overall integrity of the network. Even then it wouldn’t silence the speech because of the speech, but because of the network.

        Their instance continues to exist without us, their free speech continues, but by remaining federated we are giving them a platform.

        Look, it’s one thing to be put off by someone going out of their way to affront you. It’s another to feel affronted after going out of your way to find if there is something objectionable anywhere. By that logic, since you have found something then defederation alone should not be enough, as “we are giving them a platform” still, because other people might visit there directly instead of through federation. Therefore, due to that situation, they should not have an DNS entry so you work on their Registrar to “deplatform” them. Then, because someone can connect using an IP address, their ISP should disconnect their service or else they’re providing their ISP as a platform. But as they can get another ISP in this day of mobile connectivity, you could chase down their power company, yes, because their power company is a platform – as is their landlord – as is their employer. And so on.

        I remain unconvinced.

        • Jour@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could write 5000 words and I doubt they would change their views. Still I certainly enjoyed reading your words. Best regards.