Democratic lawmakers in Oregon on Tuesday unveiled a sweeping new bill that would undo a key part of the state’s first-in-the-nation drug decriminalization law, a recognition that public opinion has soured on the measure amid rampant public drug use during the fentanyl crisis.

The bill would recriminalize the possession of small amounts of drugs as a low-level misdemeanor, enabling police to confiscate them and crack down on their use on sidewalks and in parks, its authors said. It also aims to make it easier to prosecute dealers, to access addiction treatment medication, and to obtain and keep housing without facing discrimination for using that medication.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oregonian here… Measure 110 is an absolute shit show.

    Yes, it decriminalized drugs and funded treatment programs, but the problem was the treatment programs were 100% optional.

    Here’s how it “worked”:

    Get busted with drugs, it’s a $100 fine.
    Fine can get waived if you call a toll free number to ask about treatment.
    Note: All you had to do was call the number. You didn’t have to actually GET treatment.

    Initially 16,000 or so people were cited in the first year, 0.85% (~136) sought treatment.

    https://www.oregonlive.com/health/2022/09/oregons-drug-decriminalization-effort-sends-less-than-1-of-people-to-treatment.html

    The rest were looking for free needle exchanges, free methadone, free naloxone.

    There are no real consequences, and unlike booze and pot, there are no laws banning public use of hard drugs.

    So we get open air drug markets, run by cartels from Honduras, in this case mere blocks from police HQ:

    https://www.wweek.com/news/courts/2023/03/25/whos-running-downtown-portlands-open-air-fentanyl-market/

    https://www.koin.com/news/crime/feds-drug-traffickers-using-honduran-nationals-to-funnel-fentanyl-into-portland/

    https://www.justice.gov/usao-or/pr/honduran-man-arrested-portland-trafficking-rainbow-fentanyl-and-firearms-charged-federal

    • panicnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      As those articles you linked point out, it is illegal to sell drugs and the police arrest people who do. What exactly are you recriminalizing? Is this a case where the POLICE do not want to actively solve the drug selling problem because they want to return to the days when the state money was being funneled to them and not treatment programs? We lived with possession being criminalized and nothing working since the 80s. I think we can try decriminalizing possession for long enough to get the treatment programs running.

      Drug use is way up in states that are not Oregon. Fentanyl and Covid have changed the game. The timing is unfortunate sadly to try something new.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Bingo. The state hasn’t actually funded any new treatment centers and things like using drugs in a park are already illegal. This is just a way for the state to get off the hook for actually funding treatment centers while throwing a bone to police who are butthurt that they lost one of their easiest, low effort methods to arrest someone. Most of the stats thrown around about drug use in this state were from before this law even passed, so how will going right back to the old system improve anything? Democrats are lucky that Republican legislators are such pieces of trash because otherwise they’d actually be held accountable for being such huge disappointments to the population.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The police don’t arrest people who do, that’s part of the problem. They can be embarrased into action by the media, they take action if the problem gets “bad enough”.

        Meanwhile:

        Overdoses are through the roof:

        https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/the-story/portland-downtown-firefighter-overdose-calls-narcan-deaths/283-a37b7402-c199-40ce-a120-bb6aec149365

        "In June alone, firefighters from Station 1 responded to 300 overdoses.

        Portland police data shows that back in 2020 nearly 90 people died from overdoses. The number jumped to 135 in 2021, then to 159 in all of 2022. So far this year there have been 151 deaths, all in less than seven months. Police expect that number to be around 300 by year’s end. 

        Portland firefighters are responding to more overdoses than fires — and when they do respond to a fire, it’s often-homeless camp related."

        https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2023/04/pills-petty-crime-despair-a-perfect-storm-batters-heart-of-downtown-portland.html

        Drug related theft is through the roof:

        https://www.koin.com/news/crime/retail-theft-linked-to-drugs-stolen-vehicles-in-portland/

        • panicnow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I generally agree with your take on what is happening. But drug overdoses are way up in all states because of Fentanyl and Covid related breakdown of social programs. Since overdoses increased in other states too, I find it unlikely that we need to recriminalize to reduce them. Additionally, we have DECADES of criminalization that wasted billions without fixing the problem. How will this criminalization do what was not done in all that time in all those states. If it won’t fix it, why do we want to dump money into the police and courts?

          I support a lot of actions to reduce the nuisance. I hate cleaning up needles and seeing public spaces turned into inhospitable areas. I just don’t think criminalization of possession is going to fix that. It didn’t for the last 40 years. It won’t now.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Why should there be consequences for possessing something that’s been decriminalized? Like it seems like you’re missing the entire point?

      People looking for safe injection sites and needle exchanges is a good thing, it’s called harm reduction. That’s a win. That’s one of the main things that decriminalization allows us to do; let people use their drug of choice safely and privately.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Guns are legal, but there’s still penalties for possession in certain circumstances. Why should drugs be different? There’s no reason to be going around in public with a pocket full of meth.