• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Yeah it does sound like an apology. You sit here hemming and hawing over the two-sides of the same coin fallacy saying one is perhaps slightly worse than the other.

    You can’t even compare the two logically as candidates or human beings. I guess when you had a daughter who was raped and the police won’t take it seriously because of our fucked up culture it changes you.

    I won’t sit here and listen to a detached armchair comparison of the economic outlooks if one gets elected over the other. Like that is what even fucking matters and in fact plays into decades of bullshit rhetoric the right has been pushing. The conservatives have never been better with the economy and that is objectively verifiable.

    You pretend that Trump can’t break this country. That putting a buffoon in charge doesn’t denigrate our place in the world. That the women in our country will ever feel safe, that discrimination won’t reign supreme.

    You act like it is no big deal because you are privileged. You think it won’t affect you and you know the fucked up part. It may not.

    But it will affect a lot of others. People you probably don’t think about. If you did you wouldn’t be worried about the economics and status quo.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      The conservatives have never been better with the economy and that is objectively verifiable.

      The fact that we’re even talking about the economy in a presidential race is honestly pretty ridiculous, the only impact the President has on the economy tends to be negative. Economic policy is a mix of the Federal Reserve policies and legislation, neither of which the President has a ton of control over. That said, Congress usually lets the President champion a bill or two.

      Also, economic policy usually has a delayed impact, usually by a few years, so it’s often difficult to attribute economic changes to specific presidents. Yet, for some reason we give the sitting president the credit or blame for whatever happens, which encourages the President to take short-term measures to delay a recession.

      You pretend that Trump can’t break this country

      It’s possible he could, I just don’t think he’ll try to. He’ll certainly try to interfere w/ the economy (i.e. tariffs and other trade war nonsense), but I honestly don’t think he has plans beyond that.

      I highly doubt he’ll have any impact on women, aside from perhaps those in the White House with him. He really doesn’t seem interested in getting involved in any of those issues, and he has even pushed back on legislative changes to abortion policy. It just doesn’t seem to be something he really wants to touch, but he’ll certainly take credit for the actions of others when he thinks it’ll benefit him (i.e. him bragging about overturning Roe v Wade, as if he actually had a hand in that at all…).

      You act like it is no big deal

      It is a big deal, and I’m really frustrated at the awful choices we have this year. Harris was dead last on my list of preferences when she ran for President, and her record as VP hasn’t changed my mind. I think she’s a terrible candidate, not because she’s a woman or any nonsense like that, I just think she doesn’t have good policies (or honestly any policies at all). In fact, I don’t even know what motivates her, she seems to also just say whatever she thinks people will like, but I guess she wins because she’s not nearly as extreme as her competitor. So it’s like picking between a soggy sandwich and obviously undercooked pork, one will make me regret eating it for the next hour, the other will make me regret it for the next day.

      That said, Trump is way worse. Biden was my first vote for a Democrat for President ever, not because I liked him (he was almost my last pick when he ran for President), but because I thought he actually had a chance at winning my state since Trump is so disliked here. But no, he lost by 20% or so like every other candidate in my red state. I usually vote for a third party I agree with, but Trump’s first term changed that.

      I’m absolutely with you that Trump is terrible. I just think he’s being made out to be a lot of things that he’s not, and that causes people to dismiss criticism against him. I think Trump is dangerous, not because he’s fascist or anything of that nature, but because he’s a narcissist, and not a particularly bright one at that. He seems to actually think crippling tariffs are a good thing, which is absolutely nuts! He would absolutely cause problems, but ones we can manage. On the bright side, hopefully it’ll demonstrate, yet again, that high tariffs are a terrible idea.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        I totally agree that talking about the economy is just stupid. It has been a conservative talking point for decades now and is ridiculous to bring up for most of the reasons you cited.

        You can’t deny he tried to overthrow our rule of law. You seem to think he is so inept that if he tries again he will fail. This is akin to letting an arsonist play with fire in your house because last time he couldn’t keep the fire going.

        As I was explaining your privilege keeps you from seeing what it means to women to have a serial rapist in the white house. The kind of guy who jokes about sexual assaults and walks in on underage girls dressing just because he can.

        The damage has already been done and now it is insult to injury. It really is hard to describe a world to men where women live in constant fear of sexual violence. This is what having Trump as President means. Make no mistake that women are not the only group that will suffer.

        The psychological damage alone of having a abuser represent our country is a bridge too far. The damage his first presidency did will be felt for decades. Another will snuff out the dreams and desires of so many Americans along with emboldening the worst of our society.

        There is no comparison between a narcissist felonious rapist and our current VP. Like I was saying logically you can’t compare the two despite your attempts to. I really do think your take is pretty ridiculous.

        It is like you have already fallen for their shit rhetoric and now you have to fight to justify the garbage reasoning in your head.

        We are not voting for Trump, we are voting for his apparatus. Your belief he won’t go after women when his apparatus has already set their rights back several decades is ludicrous.

        I get you can’t blame Trump personally because he is self absorbed and incompetent. I generally agree. But just like with Reagan the president is just a figurehead and their mind can be completely gone because it is their apparatus that is really running things.

        This is the crux of the whole issue. If Trump is a figurehead what does he represent? What does Harris represent? Look at what they claim, say, and have done. If Harris is a soggy sandwich then Trump is two pieces of asphalt with a turd in between them.

        We can’t manage the damage and your resignation just shows you are unwilling to fight for what is right. When they are done othering everyone else who will defend you?

        Perhaps you are counting on your privilege to save you. Sounds like you may manage but millions of others whether it be the dreamers, LGBQ, transgender, POC, immigrants, Muslims, or women won’t be able to.

        All I really hear from you is, “I will survive another Trump presidency”. Well good for you, but you are missing the point.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          This is akin to letting an arsonist play with fire

          It’s more like telling all of your friends to avoid MLMs using easily falsifiable or overly exaggerated reasons, and when they end up meeting with an MLM rep, they’re more likely to sign up because the rep can easily explain away those concerns. A lot of what I see about Trump is akin to “don’t vote for Trump, he’s going to Auschwitz your LGBT friends!” If they actually research him, they’ll quickly see that’s not the case at all, and they’ll wonder what else you’re exaggerating about.

          I think a better approach to convincing someone Trump is dangerous is less about alarmism and more about revealing who he actually is. He’s a narcissist who doesn’t listen to his advisors and doesn’t seem to understand economic policy (plenty of evidence of both), so he’s more likely to confidently do things that will hurt the nation, not out of malice, but incompetence. Running an economy is very different from running a company, yet Trump seems intent on doing that. Case in point, economists are pretty united in saying his tariff plans will be harmful for the American public. If they can view Trump through that lens, they’ll understand a lot of why he says what he says, and decide that maybe they don’t want someone who just wants to see their name in headlines and instead someone who will listen to experts.

          Going along with that theme, I really don’t see a reason for Trump to attempt to stay in office after his term. He’s a narcissist, so he wants his name to show up among “best presidents ever” instead of “traitorous presidents put in jail after a failed coup.” He has already said he’s not interested in running again if he isn’t elected, which is completely different from his messaging 4 years ago. He wants a legacy, not power.

          logically you can’t compare the two

          I’m comparing their proposed policies, which is absolutely relevant here. Harris will be decidedly better for the economy, but still pretty bad IMO. However, I think Congress will stop the worst of Harris’ agenda, whereas Trump seems confident he can accomplish it without Congress, so in general I’d prefer Harris. That said, I’m not voting for her, because my state will elect Trump by ~20% regardless of what I do, so I might as well vote my conscience.

          it is their apparatus that is really running things

          Then it makes more sense to push for non-Republicans in Congress than the executive branch. Point out that Trump is temporary, but Senate and House seats can last much longer. They’re the ones who will be approving justices, writing laws, and potentially impeaching the President.

          your resignation just shows you are unwilling to fight for what is right

          No, I just have more than the next election in mind. I’m much less worried about Trump and more worried about whoever comes after Trump. Maybe it’ll be someone else piggy-backing off his ideas, but they’re younger and more interested in control. We can only cry wolf so many times…

          POC, immigrants

          My SO is a POC immigrant, as are some of my best friends.

        • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          I am white and well off. I will probably survive another Trump presidency. I am also bisexual and I care about my fellow man. I don’t know if I really will or not, and I know many won’t.