• GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    ‘You’re all making fun of it and yet you buy it’

    No, those are two different groups. Gamers ™ are not a monolithic block. Some like it, some hate it, some in between. To lump that all together is moronic.

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Most Outspoken Gamerstm nowadays don’t even play the games they’re being outspoken about. Look at all the clowns calling Ghost of Yotei “woke” for having a female protagonist when Tsushima already had multiple female warriors.

  • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    30 days ago

    Nesmith said he no longer remembers the exact sales figures for the add-on, but he remembers it being a lot. “It must have been in the millions, it had to be millions,” he said.

    So… No accounting for how many of these sales came from bundles/GOTY editions, and we are just going off his memory of the sales numbers?

    Great reporting, this really vindicated Horse Armor’s legacy…

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yeah I had the GOTY edition with shivering isles etc, but if it came with the horse armor I have no memory of it. I certainly didn’t buy it with horse armor in mind. I’d like to know if that was included in the figures.

      We know pretty damn well that people buy cosmetics though, especially in the current gaming landscape. So he’s right, and we all lost something important here

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Did you expect him to put in a request for that information with their archive accounting department for transactions from 18 years ago? Come on, man!

      • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I didn’t expect him to do anything. But does he expect anecdotal evidence provided without context to change my mind on horse armor? Come on man!

      • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        I mean, if you asked me something like that about our system’s sales, I’d have an answer for you in a few minutes. But then, I’m BI and not Accounting, so I’m probably more proficient at pulling aggregated data straight from the archive DB.

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Sssoooooo… they can’t fathom that the millions that bought it aren’t the same people as the tens of millions that made fun of it?

    How do these people run companies?

    • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      The issue is they didnt need the tens of millions to buy it they only needed the millions that did buy it to make bank and not care

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Because its not a meritocracy. We need to stop assuming these people somehow “deserve” the power and/or wealth that they’ve accumulated.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      To be fair running a company you would likely want to focus on the people that give you money, not the group that complains and doesn’t.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Yep. The type of people buying the horse armor are not the people who are complaining about what it means for a full priced game to have such and and the direction that pointed the company in. Given this is what he is talking about now, and not how they have lost their way and are working on delivering solid experience for players, unlike their last games, is telling.

      But, I lost all hope for TES6 to be good when Starfield came out. Maybe I’ll be wrong, hopefully I’ll be wrong, but I’m not holding my breath.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        Maybe in five years, if (and only if) they keep working on it like No Man’s Sky, then maybe Starfield might be redeemed.

        But they’ve already fucked up by making the DLC paid. Until the game is playable, they should be reinvesting their original sales income. Otherwise they burn all the good will.

        • Magiilaro@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          The game is very much playable, I have sunk 200+ hours into it and still have very much fun playing it. Not every game has to be for everyone.

          • Troy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            29 days ago

            Very true. I went in with perhaps unrealistic expectations and didn’t enjoy the gameplay loop. When I enjoy a game, I really enjoy a game, with several titles having 1000+ hours.

            Someone needs to introduce Bethesda to Markov chain based storytelling if they’re going to use procedural generation. Anyway, I digress. I’m looking forward to Outer Worlds 2 ;)

      • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        I’m running on the hope that Starfield was meh because they secretly have the majority of staff working on TES6 or that they rushed it because they’re working on new engine.

        I can dream

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          It is public knowledge this isn’t the case. Nearly the full team was on Starfield, with maybe a handful of people at most working on pre-production of TESVI.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    I stopped buying their trash after fallout 4 which was a decent game but kinda dated when it came out.

    They keep trying to milk that formular while others moved forward

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    No Bruce, the people that complained simply stopped buying and playing Bethesda made games. The people who bought that stuff are different people.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’ve kept buying their games (not Starfield though), but I never purchased any of these things. I also never purchased all of the DLCs for FO4 or even Skyrim IIRC. They just never seemed worth buying. I’ll buy stuff if they make stuff worth buying, but I’ve become so jaded by them that I have to think really hard about it and I assume it won’t be worth it at this point.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    “You’re threatening to ruin the entire industry with nickel-and-dime horseshit that only has to sell to a fraction of players to outweigh how angry it makes everyone else.”

    “Yeah but a big enough fraction bought it to outweigh how angry you are, so there.”