• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There’s no difference with a broken court and we can’t fix that with our current Congress

    We dont need congress to expand the SC court…

    https://journals.law.harvard.edu/lpr/2019/05/06/the-supreme-court-has-been-expanded-many-times-before-here-are-four-ways-to-do-it-today/

    Just like Obama didn’t need Congress to approve his last pick, they have to give Congress a chance to vote, but there’s nothing saying they have to.

    So the absence of their decision should have resulted in Obama sitting someone anyways during his last year.

    Why are you being so combative? I’m not even the person you were first talking to.

    Because explaining the same thing over and over gets frustrating…

    Which is why I’m probably going to give up on explaining this in a way you can understand pretty soon.

    If you want ignore that link from Harvard and just keep arguing…

    I view slapfights as a waste of time, but feel free to keep trying. What’s weird is after I block one of them, it’s common to get accounts with almost no activity immediately taking up the arguement, even in day old threads that aren’t getting any other new replies.

    Could it be a giant coincidence?

    Sure but I just don’t think it’s likely.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      We dont need congress to expand the SC court…

      Literally all four of those options require legislation to move through the halls of Congress. Did you even read that source?