• Five@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This bot comment adds nothing of value and only wastes page space, which is actually an improvement over the bot’s typical function. MBFC is a threat to media literacy on Lemmy.

    Fact-checking is an essential tool in fighting the waves of fake news polluting the public discourse. But if that fact-checking is partisan, then it only acerbates the problem of people divided on the basics of a shared reality.

    This is why a consortium of fact-checking institutions have joined together to form the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), and laid out a code of principles. You can find a list of signatories as well as vetted organizations on their website.

    MBFC is not a signatory to the IFCN code of principles. As a partisan organization, it violates the standards that journalists have recognized as essential to restoring trust in the veracity of the news. Partisan fact-checking sites are worse than no fact-checking at all. Just like how the proliferation of fake news undermines the authority of journalism, the growing popularity of a fact-checking site by a political hack like MBFC’s man behind the curtain, Dave M. Van Zandt, undermines the authority of non-partisan fact-checking institutions in the public consciousness.

    • duffman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      “Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News) adheres to the International Fact-Checking Network Fact-checkers’ Code of Principles. The Poynter Institute developed these principles to promote excellence and standardization in Fact-Checking.”

      Seems like they are on board with those principals. Also, explain how it’s partisan please.

      • Five@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Membership in the IFCN provides a method for member organizations to be held accountable to the IFCN code.

        Would you trust an organization that claims to follow a code, but has either been denied and had their membership rescinded for violations of that code, or has chosen to avoid being held accountable in the first place?