we need teleportation frankly

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Teleportation is just a high tech suicide booth.

    That’s a matter of opinion.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No. Since it is impossible, any discussion on it is just speculation. You are saying it is a high tech suicide booth based on how it is portrayed in Trek…Which is fiction.

        Same with time travel.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not though, we’ve already managed to quantum teleport clusters of atoms. If managed on a larger scale, there can be no continuity between consciousness, therefore suicide booth.

          I get it, you are just one of those types that loves to argue without thinking. Thankfully lemmy doesn’t use reddit’s stupid blocking method so excising you from my internet forever is painless and entertaining.

          • dsemy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            11 months ago

            What if physicists find a way to bend space such that you’d be able to move instantly (through some sort of portal) between two extremely far places while staying at a normal speed?

            Just because quantum teleportation has “teleoprtation” in its name, doesn’t mean it’s the only possible form of it.

            Don’t blame others for arguing without thinking if you haven’t given it proper thought yourself.

            • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              The gravity needed to even create small hypothetical spacetime bridges would spaghettify any normal matter passing through it.

              Just because quantum teleportation has “teleoprtation” in its name, doesn’t mean it’s the only possible form of it.

              It kind of does. Wormholes are not teleportation. ANY method that ‘moves’ atoms from one place to another falls under the ‘suicide booth’ category.

              if you haven’t given it proper thought yourself.

              You really have no fuckdamn idea how long I have been thinking about this exact subject.

              • dsemy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                11 months ago

                You have really strong opinions on this considering most of this is purely theoretical.

                AFAIK no wormholes were ever observed or created, and there are many theories on how they maybe created (artificially or naturally) and/or traversed.

                Also, any I think any reasonable person would say you teleported if he saw you going through a portal.

                We also don’t understand consciousness, so no one really knows what happens when you use a ‘suicide booth’ like you imagine. Maybe it’s even possible to just teleport your consciousness too.

                You really have no fuckdamn idea how long I have been thinking about this exact subject.

                Neither do you.

          • ShadowRam@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            See, that’s the problem with modern science reporting. People are so easily confused.

            No. We have never teleported atoms.

            We did the equivalent of a fax machine.

            We took an atoms current state, sent that information down traditional communication lines, and copied it’s state perfectly to another atom.

            They call it Quantum Teleportation, but it has nothing to do with Sci-Fi teleportation as most people think of it.

            • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ok I have come to realize that lemmy is literally no better than reddit when it comes to people who are so arrogant in their ignorance.

              Imposing a quantum state on remote matter is the ONLY way teleportation will work. The ‘faxing’ is exactly what large scale teleportation would consist of for every particle state that composes the entity being transported.

              You don’t literally send the same particles, you use the particles at the destination to reassemble the original.

              Previously I thought it was just reddit that had gotten worse in the last 10 years but I’ve come to understand it’s just the internet in general.

              Sure as fuck wish I could go back to the internet before smartphones so all you fuckdamn idiots would stop wasting my time.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not really.

          We exist as a contiguous, always active self-modifying chemical cascade. This is a scientific fact.

          Our sense of consciousness is what we refer to as our selves. This is pretty concrete philosophical conjecture.

          Any teleporter device that rearranges atoms breaks this contiguity. This is scientific fact.

          If a teleporter device that rearranges atoms can be invented (and I believe it can but not for a long time) to move a human, then the human that arrives on the other end of the teleport will not be the ‘you’ that looks out from your eyes now as the contiguity is broken. It will THINK it is you, will have your memories, but your current consciousness wouldn’t ‘jump’ to that newly created homunculus. It would simply cease to exist. You think this is philosophy but it is a scientific fact.

          I’m not arguing for the existence of a ‘soul’ here, just stating the simple truth that a machine that reassembles atoms into you isn’t making a you that exists now, but rather a just-born being who thinks its been living your life.

          And the you that exists now ceases to be.

          Please don’t try the ‘falling to sleep’ argument, at no point during that time does the complex bioprocess that makes up our being cease.

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Your arrogance is staggering. Is science not also a form of philosophy? And anyway, it’s not a scientific ‘fact’ that your consciousness will do anything at all, the hard problem of consciousness is not yet solved.

            • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Your arrogance is staggering. Is science not also a form of philosophy?

              Sure, 200 years ago when they called it ‘natural philosoply’, but the advent of the scientific method is what transitioned it away from pretty words and feelings to concrete observable, recordable data.

              If you can’t see the difference, you aren’t worth wasting electrons on.

              s not a scientific ‘fact’ that your consciousness will do anything at all,

              Oh but it is my friend and the wonderful thought experiment that is the game SOMA can make that clear to you, if you are capable of understanding it.

              Every examination of cranial and nerve damage in relation to consciousness has made it pretty clear that whatever it is that is our self-awareness is tied to the fat and nerves in our skull, and when disturbed often have drastic results on our cognition, awareness, and sense of self. These are things we have been documenting for centuries. Damage the brain, damage the consciousness. And to a lesser extent the spine but that is still fringe.

              Our consciousness isn’t anything special phenomenologically, it consists of complex interactions yes but there is no non-material aspect of it other than what we experience as our cognition, which is not an actual space but rather the results of our self-modifying chemical cascade.

              What you think of as arrogance is rather the result of spending decades both in a scholarly frame as well as for personal pleasure studying biology, physics, and psychology. I’m sorry that up until now your main conversation group has consisted of people who think communications in excess of 144 characters is mentally draining.

              • Kata1yst@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah I’m with you on this. Even from a pure science fiction perspective there’s just no way the experience of consciousness “transfers” by any currently understood science.

                Just like when you move a computer’s file across the Internet the result would be a copy, and that wouldn’t really be noticable or impactful to the copy or the people who know you and the copy would interact with, but it would make a hell of a lot of difference for the person going in. Great if you’re dying and want to do what you can (The Culture book series covers this possibility quite well) but otherwise small comfort.

                Best case scenario is “The Prestige”, but with a much quicker and cleaner death.

                And if someone slaps “quantum entanglement” on the table like that is a real answer for anything, imma not even bother.

                • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Fucking finally someone in this thread that makes sense.

                  Haven’t read the Culture books yet but your post is the third reference I’ve seen this week so maybe I got a new series to read.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Consciousness can be thought as software running on hardware (your brain). You do not destroy software by destroying hardware.

            Whether you agree with this or not is not relevant to this discussion, since my point is that whether the above statement is true belongs to philosophy, not to science.