• Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because it’s important to distinguish that it was an insurrection and to not water it down with other terms.

      • ZeDespo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s what I thought too, but the author made an interesting point:

        Calabresi suggests that the January 6 attack fits the definition of a “riot.” Perhaps so. But “riot” and “insurrection” aren’t mutually exclusive concepts. An event can be both at the same time. Indeed, that’s a common occurrence in history.