• Kbobabob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because it’s important to distinguish that it was an insurrection and to not water it down with other terms.

    • ZeDespo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s what I thought too, but the author made an interesting point:

      Calabresi suggests that the January 6 attack fits the definition of a “riot.” Perhaps so. But “riot” and “insurrection” aren’t mutually exclusive concepts. An event can be both at the same time. Indeed, that’s a common occurrence in history.