some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.world · 5 months agoMicrosoft’s AI boss thinks it’s perfectly OK to steal content if it’s on the open webwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down133cross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pubtechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1572arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft’s AI boss thinks it’s perfectly OK to steal content if it’s on the open webwww.theverge.comsome_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square141fedilinkcross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pubtechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-squaregrrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down5·5 months agoNo you have to run them through an elaborate model first, then it’s totally legit to use someone else’s literal words as if they were your own
minus-squarebitwaba@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·5 months agoI mean, that’s how I got through high school. So sure.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·5 months agoYou’re describing how human beings learn and create.
minus-squaregrrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·5 months agoI was actually describing a piece of software, which is not considered a human being, and can in fact be treated differently without any legal or philosophical confusion
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25510721/1728635496.jpg)
No you have to run them through an elaborate model first, then it’s totally legit to use someone else’s literal words as if they were your own
I mean, that’s how I got through high school. So sure.
You’re describing how human beings learn and create.
I was actually describing a piece of software, which is not considered a human being, and can in fact be treated differently without any legal or philosophical confusion