• neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the most glaringly narrow and selective interpretation of my comment.

    • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I could have come at this from any angle and it would look bad for you.

      Two wrongs make a right?

      See previous comment

      Also technology has changed a lot since the forties.

      Exactly. Israels capabilities would be sufficient to wipe Gaza off the face of the earth within a couple days, since they have access to technology that the allies could have only dreamed about. So why don’t they?

      And last I checked, nazi Germany was not some sort of prisoner state to the US.

      Maybe you should check again, since nazi Germany was literally occupied by the US after we surrendered in 45. In fact it was initially divided into four zones controlled by France, USA, UK and the USSR. It’s almost like losing a war you started will net you a military occupation. Now tell me, in which position could a country be after losing four wars in a row when it is let by a militia that was formed to literally cleanse the earth of jews? Small hint, the moral high ground is not one of them.

      So many reasons your comment makes 0 sense.

      True

      • neptune@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        OK thanks for taking a week to completely miss the point again. Like a laughable waste of time.

        You quote me saying the US didn’t have nazi Germany occupied, like it’s not relevant to what happened during the war, but then you say the US occupied Germany after the war. Not relevant. Isreal is occupying Gaza before during and after this “war”.

        Maybe in February you’ll have a change of heart.