• beckerist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    348
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Scheming EU states” is a total flame bait headline. The UK is not part of the EU, so why should they be included in any of this? They should be HAPPY about the EU not “meddling” with their “freedom”!

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only that, but there are also two arrows on this map going into the UK. It’s up to the UK to take care of how well these arrows connect to important locations within their borders. There really doesn’t appear to be an issue whatsoever.

      • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        These arrows already exist! The France one is the English tunnel and the Ireland one is there because they need to make Ireland feel like one island. The uk dont have much control over how well they connect to their border. I think the uk would have benefited from this plan as they seem to be having problems with trains

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really, though? There are no development plans for the new railways in the UK and furthermore the entirety of the UK is greyed out but all the independent area of Ireland is part of the map.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s the point, no? It’s unfortunately up to the UK now to do what they will with the transport systems the EU will hook them up with.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Listen, I’m not defending the article written by people who supported Brexit then got mad about how much of a shit deal Brexit is for them, but the point of the above comment is that the maps include arrows connecting to UK Railways, but that’s besides the point because the larger context of the discussion is about how a massive Railway Expansion project completely excludes the UK. It’s completely moot and irrelevant to talk about the existing railways.

            • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Huh? Apologies for being slow but what is your point?

              My neighbour redid their driveway, it completely excludes my driveway, obviously. We used to share a driveway mind you and we could have shared the cost of whe work on both our driveway but I got uptight because he let brown people use both our driveways. I told him driveways first, my driveway is losing its identity due to all the brown people and I got the whole neighbourhood to vote against shared driveways.

              Pretty fucking cunty of him to only redo his driveway now though innit?

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I will go very slowly.

                1. The rails are connected

                2. The UK is not part of the plan

                There is no point in mentioning that the rails are connected in a discussion about the UK not being part of the plan. It’s just silly. It’s like talking about changes to cars and one person in the conversation starts talking about how the wheels have been the same for 14 years now.

            • 9bananas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              the UK cannot be included, because they aren’t a Schengen-member and the EU doesn’t want customs checks on their train lines…

              it’s entirely up to the UK what they do with their rails within their borders.

              and as was already pointed out:

              there already IS a connection between the EU and the UK!!

              the new plans are largely for connections between capitals of EU countries and major population centers, both of which already have rail connections in the UK.

              so what do you expect the EU to do about the rail network in the UK?

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes the rails are connected, but you should not be arguing to me that this means the UK is part of the plan when it very clearly isn’t. You’re arguing on both sides right now, I don’t think you’re in the right state of mind.

              • 520@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                the UK cannot be included, because they aren’t a Schengen-member and the EU doesn’t want customs checks on their train lines…

                Ireland is also not a member of the Schengen agreement…

            • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              the larger context of the discussion is about how a massive Railway Expansion project completely excludes the UK.

              Why should EU project include non-EU states?

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It shouldn’t, but that’s not what the discussion is about, is it? Somebody made a statement that it IS part of the plan, which is verifiably false.

                  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I can’t tell if you’re lost or trolling. If you go up this thread to the comment I first replied to:

                    Not only that, but there are also two arrows on this map going into the UK. It’s up to the UK to take care of how well these arrows connect to important locations within their borders. There really doesn’t appear to be an issue whatsoever.

                    and this is in a discussion about the EU’s renovated railway plans centered around TransEuropean Landmark transport. It also has arrows pointing into Ukraine and Belarus, but that doesn’t mean any of those countries are included in the plans.

                    I also want to stress again, since many of you seem easily confused, I think the UK SHOULD be responsible for their own railway improvements building upon the plans of the EU by themselves, since that’s the logical conclusion of Brexit, but it makes no sense to say they’re part of the plan when they’re not part of the plan.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I found the wikipedia article:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-European_Transport_Network#List_of_transport_networks

      Apparently initial proposals for this pre-date brexit by 26 years.

      This is a Daily Express article. Utter trash, right wing yellow journalism. Rabidly pro-brexit, endorsed Liz Truss for PM. You know, the weird cheese lady who was outlasted by a lettuce.

      Obviously brexit isn’t going so well and neither is the latest tory PM, so it’s time for their daily article about how the foreigners done ruined Engerland.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        outlasted by a lettuce.

        American here. How much is that converted to Mooches?

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that idiotic and corrosive Brexit campaign had been defeated, the headline might be screaming how scheming EU nations drag the UK into their expensive transport plans.

      Also the same mindless parrots on their tellys and newspapers would be mindlessly arguing the point, tossing out word salads, exactly as they would with the EU making their plans and keeping the UK out of them.

      Meanwhile, non-voters who could have made a difference will be just as idiotic on polling day: “Politics is for wankers/both parties are the same. Shall we go for drinks?”

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s wild to me how America, UK, and Canada are dealing with these idiotic right wing extremists or fans. It did not go well in the states, is still not going well, but people in other countries are all agreeing that yeah now is the time to be loud, racist, shitholes who make life worse for everyone with their stupidity??? What the fuuuck

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the Daily Express, an offshoot of the Daily Mail. They both have ridiculously anti EU slants and have had those for decades

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every since the thought occurred to me I can’t stop thinking about it. There is just this entire class of people out there who do no real work, are paid money to tell us how they should be running things, and whose only plan in running things is to take something that works and break it.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UK doesn’t need to be part of this really, there’s one link to mainland Europe (the channel tunnel) and the rest should just be sensible UK road and rail network planning. NI and Ireland already have ways to cooperate when it comes to planning transport on the Ireland of Island.

      I say “in theory” because our government just scrapped HS2 phase 2, so our rail network is going to continue to be shit for years.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        on the Ireland of Island

        Love this at what looks like 11pm on the day that’s in it as I write at 4am.

        Love you, neighbour. Sorry about the HS2 bullshit. Shambles tbh.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        sensible UK road and rail network planning

        How many decades has it been since THAT last happened, though?

        I say “in theory” because our government just scrapped HS2 phase 2, so our rail network is going to continue to be shit for years.

        Oh. Same page, it would seem 😁