• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 months ago

    Steam doesn’t care if a developer uses multiple store fronts.

    Epic does care about exclusivity.

    I like to to use the platform that gives me the most choice.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yep lot of focus is on Steam, but GOG has been affected by exclusivity deals too. If that is lifted than other launchers like GOG benefit too with Control being available for it too.

    • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m still waiting for the Half Life games to be released on GOG. I wonder why it will never happen…?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because the developer/publisher doesn’t want to? You can’t make them do it.

        • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. Valve/Steam wants their title only on their own platform. As does Epic with their financed title. So I don’t get that exclusivety thing. Everybody’s doing it. Some more, some less, but they do. Oh wait, gog did publish their own titles on other platforms as well.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam is being sued for including a clause that games can’t be sold on other platforms for less than they’re sold for on Steam, guess they do care about games being sold on other platforms!

      If you finance a project, it’s pretty much a given that you’ll expect something in return. Valve doesn’t finance third party project, Epic does, hence the exclusivity deals and it’s not as if we could blame devs for wanting to have guaranteed income instead of relying on word of mouth, good reviews and streamers to sell their game and recoup their investment. It’s basically choosing between having a job that pays you hourly vs day trading, sure you might make more day trading, but you might also end up losing everything because things don’t go your way.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Most Favored Nation: you can list anywhere else as long as the price isn’t lower then here

        Vs

        Exclusive: you can’t list anywhere else

        I know which I prefer.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          2 months ago

          And I prefer that games actually get developed instead of the devs giving up because funding is an issue.

          Also, how is it different if the game is only available on Steam anyway?

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            For a good review of the MFN case: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=sjteil

            If you want to say nobody’s allowed to have exclusivity deals, and nobody’s allowed to set most favorite nation pricing, I’m all for that. Let’s get that through the legislature

            Let’s say games can list on both epic and steam at the same price. Epic could take a smaller commission, and the developers could bundle extra content, features, DLC with the game on epic. There’s a lot of room for innovation here

            From a consumer protection point of view steam is saying you can’t rip our customers off. I.e. guaranteed low pricing. Just like Costco

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              What? How is saying “You can’t sell cheaper elsewhere” not ripping customers off and anti competitive?

              • stardust@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                Haven’t been affected by it. Got games like Nioh 2 and a bunch of other games during the last humble bundle choice for less than what Nioh 2 has gone on sale for by itself.

                And games frequently see sales before launch and after launch at prices that Steam won’t see for months from places like Fanatical. Isthereanydeals provides historical data on it tracking prices of games from launch across various stores.

                Regardless of the wording it hasn’t affected sales leading to most of my Steam games having been purchased outside of steam, and those sales are ones steam doesn’t get a cut of on top of that. Only steam purchases I usually make are ones where the publisher either doesn’t bother making keys, or it’s the only way to get the steam version of the game, or the rare occasion the it is actually the historical low on steam.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Quite simple really. As a customer you know if you buy a game from this platform you’re not getting ripped off with a higher price. Low price guarantee if you like

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  What?

                  That’s completely ridiculous

                  “You’re guaranteed to get the best price because the main platform prevents other from selling the same product for less.”

                  No buddy, it just means Valve’s influence leads to the same effect as a monopoly, they set the price for the whole market if people want to sell on their platform and their platform is the biggest so people want to sell on it.

                  • jet@hackertalks.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    If I open a store, and I tell people I promise you this is the lowest price in the market. I’m not doing disservice to my customers.