This guy just keeps getting more and more wonderful ❤️

  • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Joanne’s really milking this cash cow for all it’s worth, and then some. Guess that’s your only option when you’re a one-hit wonder, though. Must not have stumbled across any new content she’s interested in plagiarizing.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      one-hit wonder,

      Yeah, no kidding, I had tried everything else she did before she started getting really noisy, none of it was remotely interesting.

      Stopped me from buying the books for my kids quickly enough, though.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I mean, you could tell the point in book 4 where they said “Fuck it, bring in the ghost writers”.

      I doubt she’s probably written anything in 30 years that wasn’t drunkenly pounded out on Twitter

    • hopesdead@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      HBO previously did a adaption of The Casually Vacancy. I never watched it but I read the book which is terrible.

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Oh, what did you find terrible about the book? I thought it was sad but written with a lot of empathy. I liked the gray characters. It was even worse for me to realize what JKR was like after reading this book that seemed so right to me. But maybe I overlooked something.

    • PangurBan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      You say that like anyone else wouldn’t. If life gives you a golden cow, milk the shit out of it. Lol

      Let’s focus on her being a terrible person instead of making up nonsense reasons to further dislike her. There’s no need.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No, I think most people wouldn’t. Most people would be happy with literally becoming a fucking billionaire, and would be satisfied at that point.

        • huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I don’t know any billionaires myself, but judging from what I read and see online that is not what people do when they literally become a billionaire.

          • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah I guess it’s one of those things, where most people would be satisfied with becoming a billionaire, but generally, the type of people able to become a billionaire, are terrible people that wouldn’t be satisfied with becoming a billionaire.

            • huppakee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              16 hours ago

              TIL People who would be satisfied with being a billionaire feel satisfied long before they actually become a billionaire.

              • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Money has high diminishing returns on happiness long before a billion. It wouldn’t be surprising if literally nobody was satisfied by crossing 1,000,000,000. Some people will never be satisfied and they’re the only ones who would keep trying.

    • Katzimir@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      CouLd you point me to what original she plagiarized? I need some light reading material and this sounds promising.

        • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I’m not a fan of Harry Potter, and don’t like Rowling, but I read that whole damn essay and was not at all convinced. Half the examples could be said to be plagiarising each other by the standard they’re using. They say at the start the coincidences are too strong to be attributed to tropes, but I really disagree with that. Almost everything they list are common tropes, many even outside magical wizard settings. Mean adoptive family? Did she also plagiarise Cinderella?

          Sure, her books generally aren’t original themes, but to say they’re so similar that they are direct plagiarism is a real stretch in my opinion. Especially when you have to list like 30 books that have one or two things in common each, and mostly in a general sense.

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Exactly. It shouldn’t be considered a crime to use and build on eternal tropes. That’s what culture is about. The terrible things about JKR lie elsewhere.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            The first two or three books felt far more like a Roald Dahl novel than any standard issue YA novel.

            She’s clearly been influenced by other children’s books. But yeah, so much of the “Rowling plagiarized!” critique boils down to how bland and generic the story was.