I mean, you did say “we sound like noise to them”, which implies they can’t pick out their names.

Every cat owner can tell you that they do know their names when spoken. Also, people can train cats without transforming their voices.

Well, duh. The rabbit isn’t eating another animals poop, but their own. Sooo…

Sounds scary, but it was literally tiny specks of dust that moved in my pantry. Nothing that was identifiable as an insect. And after the moths died out, they also died out by themselves.

I think I can help you with that 😏 though I can’t get much airtime, sorry.

The only thing I ever had were food moths, after leaving an open container of flour out and putting it away after a day. It was pretty disgusting having their larvae crawling around, but luckily there are parasitic wasps you can order that kill their eggs (they look like tiny specks of dust, not normal wasps).

Have you considered getting an anteater as a pet?

Wo Nudeln?

If you do that, be aware you’ll be hit by a high-velocity stream of liquified banana

wat

Whereupon Hal discovers his love for growing plants, and gets super into it with Dewey.

deleted by creator

I mean, if you insist…

Yeah, that one I’ve definitely heard! I also feel like “streunern” by itself came up before for pets. But never “Streuner”, that’s reserved for strays.

Resting Beautiful Fiercecat

I’ve never heard “Streuner” used for a pet, only for animals without owners.

Man hätte es ja von Anfang an sicher designen und mit dem CCC besprechen können, aber das wäre ja zu viel Arbeit gewesen :(

Selbst wenn der CCC sein grünes Licht gibt, werde ich erstmal ein paar Jahre abwarten. Wenn es dann wirklich keine Leaks gab, kann man drüber nachdenken, aber das Vertrauen ist erst einmal zerstört.

No, you’re right. The important part I wanted to highlight is that the usual way is CSS, not JS. There are a bunch of websites that use JS for this purpose, and probably also many CMSs etc., but doing it using CSS is far more common.

Sure, some websites do that, but it’s simply wrong to say “having adaptive view usually requires js”. No, it doesn’t, usually responsive design doesn’t need JS.

If a browser doesn’t support media queries, it would just show the desktop version. Media queries have been broadly supported since 2015. It’s possible that Wikipedia still targets older browsers, but IMO it would be fine to show the desktop version on mobile browsers older than that.

I especially like the casual swipe at GNOME, they deserve it!