Sarcasm detected (your parent comment) - they’re going for laughs not anger

[Not offering opinion personally though]

using Netflix on his brake.

Offering Xzibit some new ideas

Interesting read from people who hate him and say he is a piece of shit, from five years ago

Also see my initial interpretation of it

https://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/jnntj5/adrian_zenz_is_a_nazi_apologist_this_is_further

Too bad it was on Twitter, I’d ask him for clarification, but we don’t do Twitter do we :)

PS: off topic - realize how careful I have to be when being irreverent and post stuff bitingly bitter (no /s, gets upvoted, and is hardcore sarcasm), so thank ya. Maybe I should try /s to protect my little reputation given ease, least for Palantir, of tying accounts to IRL

Bummer it’s come to this for the open web :(

Thank you very much for everything rikudou!

Fundamentalist is he?

Point 2: I get ya. Had me confused. Took me a sec.

Was drawing historical parallel. Note word “unpopular” in particular.

Kinda “don’t forget Hitler had supporters”, ya? If I hadn’t clicked that paraphrase woulda left me with opposite impression, would note when paraphrasing pls

Also IDK if credible cuz read one Wiki page (JK read 15% of it)

Figure he inflated numbers cuz he’s super capitalist? Citations could make sense if he’s the expert, saw he lived in China, but anyway curious your idea of his angle (ideology or money)

Dude’s a feather ruffler!:

Zenz has been the target of a pro-Beijing disinformation campaign, according to U.S.-based cybersecurity firm Mandiant.

As a result of his work on Xinjiang, Zenz has become a target for coordinated disinformation attacks from pro-Beijing and Chinese state-run media as well as other state-affiliated entities.

-Wiki (he wasn’t linked on the foundation page, nor mentioned, he founded or is director or both?)

Wow, thank you. Super interesting. (Only knew the term)

So, perhaps if the protest from the video had happened in 1942, it would have been illegal, but perhaps today it was okay. Only referring to the speech and not the volume or proximity.

—

If they’re going to keep doing signing bonuses they should add on enough classes for them to become constitutional scholars. Happily pay for that

& it was also slightly chasey too wasn’t it?

We don’t want protestors shot over a few inches when it’s (presumably or arguably) equally effective two steps back

Ohhhhh over mah head

That’s a lotta 1A

Is there a minimum required distance from these guys, where it makes your lawyer’s job harder if you get too close even if not touching?

And is profanity OK & any volume? Maybe jurisdiction dependent. IDK when they slap the “disorderly” stuff on you.

Think I recall middle finger to police was protected speech at some point, IDK maybe somebody knows this stuff. Obviously every American should feel comfortable protesting generally, just curious about finer details (can protest longer when not in jail)

Couldn’t confirm, could be deep in some PDF manual

Tok to your doktor to day

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pica_(disorder)

Anakin?

I thought they specifically were a particularly common thing to blow into waterways or something, in ways that plastic bottles etc. weren’t? [citation needed]

<3

!!!

Make conversation with other people at nightclubs!

Those who don’t want conversation will probably say nothing or one word

It’s fine trust!!

Well, actually, that was just footage from the movie Independence Day, but the real laser would be a lot like that. Yeah. Scary.

-Dr. Evil

So does

ZOOOOHHHHRRRANNNNN MAAAAMMMMMDDDAAAANNNNNIIIII

emerges onto wrestling ring to mass applause

(…anybody? Am I the only one?)

Yikes apparently fake indeed (needs a myusername label)

He said the first part in all caps, 7:27 PM · Oct 19, 2016