Another example of a company making clear that we don’t truly own the games we play on their platform.
Another example of a company making clear that we don’t truly own the games we play on their platform.
True.
And while we wait we keep our factories running, our cars on the street, our planes in the air, our meat on the tables, our plastic wrapped around everything and keep believing that we will be just fine.
I love this game. I hate thatI things seem to slow to a grind around mid game. I probably need more practice…
"He looked a little rough,” … “This is a really special little guy,”
There is a lesson in there somewhere…
Or… a cheese volcano.
Get your imagination out of the gutter.
Sorry… couldn’t resist. 😁
This applies to so many things. Someone’s lifestyle might come under attack, someone’s religion might be persecuted, someone has sensitive information to share, and so on and so forth.
To quote directly from the article:
The five plugins are:
I would say it is openSUSE Aeon.
An immutable distro that you install and it “just works”. Applications come in via the onboard Software Manager (using Flatpack). It is almost impossible to break, as the system itself is read-only. If an update should break something, the OS rolls back itself. It can do this, because it’s basically updating what you’ll get after the next reboot, not the running system. If something goes wrong, it reboots to the working version.
Still in development, but super stable.
Edit: spelling
Not mentioned in the article, but I wish there were a (simple) way to get Microsoft Store apps to run on Linux. Some do by jumping through technical hoops, but many don’t.
I mean… this could realistically be made.
Reminds me of the game The Wandering Village.
Also, we won’t stop using fossil fuels. Not anytime soon, not early enough to stop the disaster ahead.
This is pretty awesome. Looking forward to it.
Ah. You pray at the altar of Google with the mantra: “It only works in Chrome or Edge. Why not upgrade your browser?”
What could possibly go wrong with giving all the power to one browser engine? If only there was a precedent to learn from…
To answer your question, I think Linux absolutely should target the mainstream, as it already does in some ways.
For example, by making Linux more accessible to the average user, the community grows, which will probably lead to more support, more software development, and so on.
It is true that not all users have the same level of computer skills. Especially for that reason Linux should become even easier and even more intuitive to use.
In short: the more people use it, the more support it will get.
That that exists exists in that that that that exists exists in.
What are we going to name it when it is found?
I trust we really don’t want “Planet Nine” (if we do, we should rename Earth to “Planet 3”), let alone “Planet X”. Any better ideas?
Definitely real.
Plenty of sauces.