Center of gravity of the galactic cluster/supercluster
Skarbrand hates going outside! And going inside!
Skarbrand shall stay in the doorframe. He hates it slightly less.
New Bocchi the Rock lore just dropped.
Also, it’s a terrible day for rain.
So is Lemmy (the platform) a case of anarchism at work?
No. They wake up in the morning and say “Kamala and Tim wake up in the morning and say I am a really messed up human being.”
I ask so I can answer if someone asks me. Asking != denying.
If someone requests PTO, I don’t ask questions unless it’s literally in the day of or the next day.
You were crossing the border, right?
Chat, is this real?
Cake day.
Make it as generic as possible
Do you want to read paywalled news but want to bypass the paywall? It’s similar. Only difference is depending on who you ask, they like one and dislike the other—or it’s like punching up or down.
Looters (unrelated to protesters) who take the opportunity in chaos to achieve their goal - which is anywhere between getting their next meal or counterprotesters trying to disrupt the whole protest
The person with the crystals has already concluded, by faith or by doing large logical leaps, that those contain new energy.
The scientists behind the LHC have to meticulously find evidence along the way before they can make a conclusion.
They are not the same.
It’s normal. I like to think human brains are optimized like a single-core CPU, if you want to make a computer analogy. If you multitask, you’re likely to be unsatisfied on the parallel tasks you’re doing.
That they have a specific exception for IP tells me all what they really think about their customers.
This is for fiction, but would the snowflake method help?
Yes.
I used to think it’s impossible for a human to “want” sex work and default to the idea that it is inherently exploitative. Don’t get me wrong, there is sex work. But if that part is not present and they are willing to work there, what right do I have to stop them?
Socialistic polices get a bad rap because of the cold war-era communist=atheist association. Theoretically, you can reframe vast social safety nets by the government as citizens (read: also Christians) coordinating charity to be distributed more effectively. This is a bottom-up approach that has the common person’s buy-in. The reasonable criticism of the same policies lies in the top-down, legislation by fiat enactment of policy. No different than, let’s say, Netflix arbitrarily raising their prices without your input.
I think that’s a very difficult question to answer. But if you want to be as close to foolproof as you can, consider researching prior cases, such as that of Vanilla Ice and Ed Sheeran.