Copyright laws protects the ability of copyright holder to make money. The laws were created before AI and now obviously have to be adapted to new technology (like you didn’t really need copyright before the invention of printing). How exactly AI will be regulated is in the end up to society to decide, which most likely will come down who has the better lobby.
And I just disagree that kids stuff means that it should be lower quality. I think it’s just lazy. And while I understand why people are producing bad content - I don’t have to like it or applaud them for it.
I’m saying humans, even ones opponents are complex and seldom governed by single motives. Most people understand it about themself but like to deny it to others, especially they disagree with or don’t like.
That does not even make any sense.
Thinking that people you don’t like are one dimensional won’t bring you very far.
Sure (also I can’t think of any examples) - but than again the question becomes more complex and subjective: what is a good kids movie. But really often kids movie is used as an excuse for bad execution, art, storytelling, acting etc. - while I think kids deserve at least the same quality as adults maybe even better - since media has much more influence on children than on adults.
The idea that children don’t deserve good media is kind of wild to me.
Again if it’s just power and money then they would be very much interested in continuation of human spices.
I was just pointing out a flaw in your reasoning. There are no simple answers to complex questions.
Extinction would kind of interfere with the whole power and money thing.
Rather obvious punk.
That’s just what comes with internet becoming mainstream so mainstream cultural standards are applied to online conversations. It’s the difference between an opera and a punk club or something.
The future of porn are AI girlfriends with on demand content - which will have rather great impact on human relationships.
Reducing human behavior to a single hormone is a choice that is not very representative of reality.
Photography can be art as well as AI generated images can be art as well. AI is a tool and people can create art with it. But also what is art is completely subjective to the viewer.
You have examples?
Sure, I even do photography professionally form time to time - I just don’t consider it to be a painting.
What do you mean by negative spin? You don’t think that for example extreme competitiveness can be negative - or what is the point you are trying to make.
With this logic photography is a painting, painted at an impossible high speed - but for some reasons we make a difference between something humans make and machines make.
Drag is a fun concept.