![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/0d9e4437-b329-4d1b-b3a8-22bbb4186a5f.webp)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1801fd1d-aa94-416b-ab31-be0103b4ccfa.png)
The researchers in the article seem to be interested in that as well. They see their research as a pilot forhow to get useful measurements in many urban centers. I hope they receive more funding.
The researchers in the article seem to be interested in that as well. They see their research as a pilot forhow to get useful measurements in many urban centers. I hope they receive more funding.
It seems that the most significant part of this news is the enhancement in detecting atmospheric CO2 concentration in a large urban area. Being able to measure more accurately and precisely will allow better evaluation of mitigation strategies.
That sounds like an opportunity I’d be foolish to turn away.
How do we make it happen?
I could not wrap my head around that game. I feel like I’m placing stones with 60% guesswork. I haven’t played much, but I couldn’t see the difference between good and bad placement.
Thank you for this comment
@Helix@feddit.de and @Penguincoder@beehaw.org are good people.
The report itself is written in very approachable language and is worth reading beyond the summary. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmenvaud/1952/full-report.html