Liberty arguably turned the commercial aspect of formula 1 around, and FIA is ruining it with morality police bullshit. Nobody’s interested in stopping body piercings or clutching pearls over swearing besides Ben.
Liberty arguably turned the commercial aspect of formula 1 around, and FIA is ruining it with morality police bullshit. Nobody’s interested in stopping body piercings or clutching pearls over swearing besides Ben.
In the dark ages, Mosaic downloaded Firefox and IE. Time truly is a wheel.
Best use of chrome is downloading another browser.
Yeah, the instruction set and the implementation in hardware is absurd at this point.
AMD and Intel have already partnered on killing x64 in the longer run and work is under way.
They could have just illegally cut down the trees like they illegally used too much water, or any of the other things they did against their agreement with the government.
I do realize. I also realize things like weight of the train, cost of the battery packs, the fact those packs will wear and need to be replaced faster than anything else in the system, and much more.
I guess if by a kernel of truth you mean an existing train was used on an existing track, then you could almost make it make sense? But since all of this existed before, it’s just a lie.
I’ll also point out that anybody introducing battery electric trains instead of just electrifying the remaining parts of rail is making an astoundingly bad choice, but that’s almost certainly Germany and not Tesla.
You and I both know someone somewhere was that stupid before Musk. He isn’t even original in what an idiot he is. 😆
It’s also just an outright lie. But, I guess that doesn’t matter anymore.
This doesn’t change anything for starlink, because there’s almost no Brazillian users of starlink. Brazil hasn’t historically cared what foreign business says or does, and they’re much less likely to care about an Elon boondoggle like starlink.
Careful you don’t cut yourself on all that edge
Yet the desperation to be victims is as high as ever. This article isn’t believable at all, the cameras on the cars are useless, they odds of capturing a crime are near zero. But everyone here just believes it out of hand.
Hilarious stuff.
The canadian aledging the cops were going to impound their vehicle? Why would the cops involve them in any way whatsoever? The alleged perpetrator had nothing to do with the car, so I’m not sure how that does anything to them.
I just realized which community this was. Thanks for making me wonder what was wrong with the people in here enough to look.
The part where I talk about the canadian proves otherwise. So you stopped at my first sentence?
Getting a warrant to seize an uninvolved person’s property, especially a vehicle, actually is a pretty big hurdle.
… so you agree with me. Thanks.
Yeah, this article title is idiotic. The police need a warrant to take your property if you aren’t suspected in the crime. This is no different to having on-premise security camera recordings. The cops can’t just come in and take your equipment, they need a warrant. If you give up that right, that’s your choice, but it’s more than likely this Canadian has no idea what happened and made up the details.
Jo’s needs to sit down. FIA is nuts, but Jos is a clown.