As a counterpoint to most of the cynicism here, this is how the company I now work for formed. Caveats include: the founder had a lot of money because he had previously worked for a big name Internet company when it was a startup, and we spend almost all of our time as contractors for other studios rather than developing in-house IP.

Ngo monitor is right wing bullshit with zero credibility.

Holy fuck. 373 games. I’m very touched that so many are giving their hard work away to support this cause. Got it and added the extra payment on.

What if you do end up accidentally or negligently sharing this never-to-be shared identity? What if you’re unlucky enough to live somewhere where the government is one of your principal adversaries, like a Palestinian in Israel or a gay person in any number of jurisdictions? And how would you prevent the proliferation of plain ol unsigned data?

I’d dialed the batphone at the paper. After being a source on A1 for the Christmas edition,

Ok I need some help understanding what this means

If it helps, this is the first time I hear it 🤷‍♂️

There’s a Stardew valley mod that does this but it seems development has stalled

Greenhouse gases are not the only environmental concern. I do agree about a more specific time scale.

Make it a big hole, problem solved

Wow that was fascinating, thanks. For those who prefer to read, there was a full transcript!

Dave the Diver! It looks so goofy but give it a shot. It’s got hilarious cutscenes, and a really well executed blend of roguelike, restaurant game, resource management, and story RPG.

My hunch is that those layoffs are going to come from the more peripheral efforts like that malware startup they acquired

This also seems like a big issue with this report:

Not included in those percentages is money divided among multiple species.

Well, how much is that? How wide is that coverage? I felt bad for the poor mountain snail that got only $100, but if that’s only for specially allocated snail funds, maybe it’s covered elsewhere?

Maybe it isn’t covered elsewhere, and it’s still a problem. Wouldn’t know from this report.

Thanks for the thorough answer. I’ll have to do some thinking.

Where are these discussions happening? I haven’t seen much on the Lemmy instance itself until like yesterday.

This seems ideal to me. Does Lemmy not support this setup?

What in particular? Maybe these could be addressed as a fork. I would be willing to contribute to the extent I can

I, personally, believe that we all will come to a comfortable consensus moving forward

This is a somewhat uncomfortable ellipsis for me. Can you be more specific about the emerging consensus? Last time I asked this question it went ignored.

Where are these discussions happening? On the beehaw Lemmy or elsewhere?

I only saw one thread alluding to this posted by a beehaw admin on Lemmy.ml.

It’s hard to accept that Israel has the same kind of right to it as Palestinians.

Every displaced Palestinian has a home address they were forced out of, and had his home stolen by someone who felt that being Jewish gave them a right to be present in the land (sure) but also to a particular parcel of land that already belonged to particular individuals.

Zionists will tell you that most of the land was acquired legitimately. That’s an exaggeration, but some certainly was. Enough of it was outright stolen to make hundreds of thousands of refugees. I’m a one stater; there is enough room for all in the region. To the Zionist, it isn’t about a right to be there. It’s about the supposed right to dominate the land through demographic control - i.e. ethnic cleansing.

I feel that you are both right and there’s something in between. I don’t think really anyone can plead ignorance to environmental damage at this point. There’s nobody alive who doesn’t know that cigarettes are bad for you, at this point, but still, all smokers choose to take that first puff, and people have differing amounts of fervor about stopping, if they do at all.

Still, you have a point that nobody is a rational actor all the time. And even rational actors are subject to the tragedy of the commons. And some, rich or not, are just not interested in morals or the long term good.

There are some aggressively snarky lefties on here. Funny enough I felt that way more when looking at it from a different instance, but I guess internally it’s not as much of a thing because the tone is more relaxed internally, imo. Which is an interesting phenomenon. Maybe has to do with how people talk when they feel they’re in their in-group vs when they feel they have to have their defenses up.