Property of Twitter? Does Section 230 still apply then?
Property of Twitter? Does Section 230 still apply then?
James Cameron is still looking for it.
CEOs haven’t realized they’re actually the people that are easiest to replace with AI.
My boneitis!
“It wasn’t us, it was the contractors.”
The noses on the Nazi and the woman look like the other two to me.
“Don’t be evil” 2.0
https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-24-2024-series-a
This does not change the fact that the Bluesky app and the AT Protocol do not use blockchains or cryptocurrency, and we will not hyperfinancialize the social experience (through tokens, crypto trading, NFTs, etc.). To ensure we and our users benefit fully from this expertise, partner Kinjal Shah will join our board.
So we’ll see how long before the VC enshittification begins.
Edit: do you have to be male to be a cryptobro? Cryptosis?
https://www.blockchaincapital.com/team/kinjal-shah
Prior to joining Blockchain Capital, Kinjal was a Senior Consulting Analyst at Fidelity Investments in Boston. At Fidelity, Kinjal was an integral part of the strategic team developing Fidelity’s blockchain initiatives, as well as the strategy behind new asset management products.
Kinjal earned her B.S. in Quantitative Economics from Tufts University. She is a co-founder of Komorebi Collective, an investment DAO, funding female and non-binary founders in crypto.
Cool so a replacement that also has crypto bros behind it. Isn’t it fun how Mastodon doesn’t even get mentioned in major media?
They’ll be as “concerned” as Susan Collins for 4(+) years, won’t they.
The president shouldn’t be able to pardon state crimes, only federal. But who knows anything is possible now.
It seems impossible to share these facts without being told (and even feeling myself) like I’m saying there’s a Jewish conspiracy to control the media. And I know that isn’t accurate, but it feels close enough to that.
Meanwhile all we got was that bungled foxconn grift in Wisconsin with trump.
It also helps Ruben Gallego continue to move up in his political career.
It still helps. You don’t want Kari Lake around.
The thing is he could do nothing, and then tell his supporters, “I did it! I deported all the bad guys!” And they would cheer and say, “Wow everything is better now. We love Trump.”
When you’ve convinced the people of a fake problem you can just give them a fake solution. “I scared away the monster under your bed.”
Mostly yes: In a sense, doing anything “permanently and forever” is a big deal. People can change and grow, and a full permanent ban without any opportunity for appeal seems harsh. Very few things should warrant a permaban: one example that comes to mind is willfully attempting to circumvent a temporary ban. Posting spam, too.
Also no: Lemmy isn’t and shouldn’t be a critical part of anyone’s life. If you were forever banned from it, maybe it’s okay.
See the user name. They’re just using our community to spam us.