I think ‘better connected’ refers more to feature integration rather than looks. Stuff like KDE Connect.

It’s a fancy clock style, the position of the dots acts like clock arms.

You can set the clock style to “empty” and put any other clock widget you like on top instead (I use Geometric Weather). It’s unfortunate that it’s so easy to miss.

Ok, yeah, upon reflection I think I agree with you.

But a subscription to remove ads? Your app doesn’t need an external server to do that.

This is kind of a bad example because the value proposition is different but still very clear - the default version of the app provides a regular income stream to the developers. If you don’t like that, you can choose to provide an alternative income stream instead.

It is still unfair because the subscription cost is usually many times more than what the ads will earn for a single user - but it’s a matter of quantity at that point, not quality.

The Adobe case is still a much better example, IMO. Yes, they may offer regular content updates worth subscribing for, but their products could still work perfectly well as one-time purchases without access to the content stream. The only reason they didn’t is that they don’t have enough competition to be worried about customers moving away.

If the app doesn’t have network access, though, the OS sandbox should be more than sufficient to keep it secure.

A calculator app should be safe to run without updates at least until the OS APIs undergo a breaking changes (which should take several years at least).

Then you’re paying for your user account with the cloud services, not the client apps (which you may not even use, e.g. if there is a Web version or a third party client).

A subtle distinction, I know, but it matters.

Tl;dr: it’s fediverse Disqus 👍 Nice to have!