While i do get this vibe from the headline, the article actually closes with a call to be mindful of the shortcomings of generative AI (while using it)
While i do get this vibe from the headline, the article actually closes with a call to be mindful of the shortcomings of generative AI (while using it)
Die 90er haben angerufen, sie wollen ihre Weltanschauung zurück.
Did they really just cover the whole blister thing with fishmeal? I mean including the plastic?
Aaaah, die Bürokratie-Abbau-Partei FDP möchte Bürokratie wiedereinführen 🤔
In the article it does not seem like automated messages. Rather guess that their fake news detection triggered, because links to these government sites spiked even though the sites were seldom mentioned before.
Da würde ich auch auf “fahrlässige Tötung” hoffen…
Do you have a source for that?
Saying “convince me” may even get you some persuasion. ;)
Well if it naturally gravitates to inequality, l would call it an inherent property.
Warum? Ich präferieren auch ein einfaches i am Ende. Macht weniger den Eindruck aus dem Angelsächsischen zu kommen!
Aaaah, der verbotene Haltewunschtaster.
I actually see street cleaning teams here in Germany regularly where one person blows the dirt out from bike racks and from under parked cars and the other person sits in the big street sweeper to pick up the dirt. I think this is a very valid use for blowers. The blowers are electric, but I sure would.not mind them a bit more quiet.
The unfun part is when its your personal rights (personally) and you have to discuss them to defend yourself.
You need to understand that this is not about sexuality, but about patriarchy. For them sex is about power over women, not about pleasing them. Cunnilingus focuses on female pleasure, which is a problem for this world view. Men unwilling to take part in the oppression of women are seen as “unmanly”. This is expressed through the accusation of being “gay”.
I think OP has every right to complain about it in public. Since it is not common knowledge (like you said), the community is obviously lacking awareness. Telling people of marginalized communities to make their complaints about discrimination in private is harmful and hinders progress. Lets talk about these problems openly, so we can find solutions together! PS: I think there is enough space in our hearts for admin appreciation and constructive criticism.
Thats why we call these things “crown corks” in German…
In that case: excellent suggestion. :)
I mostly agree with your rules, they seem well thought out. I have two objections: Firstly altered versions of AP seems hard to enforce. I think if the versions of AP are compatible enough for federation to work, we should let it run.
Secondly, and more importantly, the part were you want to defederate with servers that do not follow these rules is a really bad idea. If some small instance wants to consume the content from threads, their users may still add content to the fediverse. I think these rules would be a good recommendation for any new server admins and committing to these rules would be a good reason to join a server. But I don’t see any reason to turn this into a “you’re either with us or against us”-type conflict.
Sadly out of service: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CarGoTram