• 6 Posts
  • 622 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle


  • Phen@lemmy.eco.brtoScience Memes@mander.xyzExhaustion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Back in school, one of my first sex ed classes, teacher says: “boys have a factory of sperm in their bodies”.

    Me, trying to be funny: “oh so that’s why sometimes there’s smoke coming out of my mouth?”

    Thankfully it landed well with the classmates, but the teacher was really worried I took it literally.










  • Audio communication is too slow. If Humans can’t evolve to communicate telepathically, language itself should evolve to account for this. Here’s what I propose:

    • we develop a mathematical formula to generate a fingerprint/signature for sentences we intent to say;
    • before saying anything, we calculate this fingerprint in our head, then say this fingerprint result, followed by the actual thing we want to say
    • the listener then gets this fingerprint result and keeps in mind; whenever it tries to predict what the full sentence from the speaker is going to be, it calculates the fingerprint for the predicted sentence and compares it to the fingerprint received at the start.
    • if the fingerprints match, then the listener reports: “I got it” and the speaker can then skip saying the rest of their sentence.

    Surely this is bound to improve communication for everyone and would have no downsides whatsoever.

    (Sorry, the amphetamines must be kicking in right about now).


  • I somehow managed to get pretty good at getting a good feeling of “did this person understood what I want them to understand?” and I adapt my level of overexplaining based on that feeling.

    It’s something I wish other people did to me as well, as I hate it when people keep talking more to make the same point I already got. Tbh sometimes I even wish people would stop mid-sentence if I already autocompleted their sentence in my head.


  • Brazil.

    If I’m at home and simply unwell, I can walk to the neighborhood clinic (one specific clinic based on my address) and get checked - that usually takes half an hour to a couple hours, but it may not always have a doctor available.

    So most people skip the local clinic completely and go to a municipal hospital instead (something doctors often plead people not to do). These should always have a couple doctors available and they’ll see anybody - even if you have no documents. When you get there a nurse will check your pulse and stuff and ask some questions to determine your priority level, then the waiting time can go up to 4 hours if it’s low priority.

    If you need specific exams, that will depend on how well equipped the hospital is. Many will do it right there, some will request it from other cities and that may take time, so there’s the option of doing it in private clinics too.

    No matter what you may end up needing, if you do it through the public health system you won’t need to pay anything at all. Even experimental treatments and surgeries can get arranged. But there’s always the option of going to private clinics as well. Those can have much shorter waiting times.

    Based on my limited experience, this is what people seem to do for each kind of visit:

    Emergencies: pretty much everybody go to public hospitals. Most places don’t even have private options for this.

    Basic check up: most people will use the public system first, unless it’s something very specific and they are well financially.

    Dental care: most people who won’t be financially crippled by it will go private. People tend to stick with the same dentist once they find a good one. On the public system you never know who you might be seeing.

    Eye doctor: 50/50. There are nearly as many private options for this as there are for dental care, but a lot of them suck.

    Expensive exams and operations: people will try to get them for free at first, or through some Health insurance plan they may have from work. Everybody knows someone who’s been waiting months for something on the public system.






  • The same folks who made Bazzite also have Aurora and Bluefin. Those are general purpose distros with the same ideas as Bazzite, just less gaming stuff bundled in. The difference between the two is just the desktop environment (gnome for bluefin, kde for aurora).

    But even though Bazzite is focused on gaming, it is still a pretty good distro for general use too. The same stuff that enables windows games to run on it also help run any windows program just as well, so it might be a good pick if you use any software that only runs on windows.