![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/bae905b8-0357-4d8f-aeee-8c3227e76c8c.png)
Did they just shovel whole bullets, casing and all, into a big air cannon and let them go?
Did they just shovel whole bullets, casing and all, into a big air cannon and let them go?
To be fair, US Republican and Russian ideologies have been aligning faster since 2016 so it may be hard to differentiate them here
It’ll never be untangled if we see a repeat in 2024…
Interesting to just look through some of them. For example: /r/cumminingonpigeons was banned
Like laying underwear with poison. Oh… right…
From what I’ve seen, Florida’s voting law that if a Florida resident is convicted of a crime in another state that would prevent them from voting based on that states voting laws, then they are not allowed to vote in Florida.
With the amount of processing it takes to generate the output, a simple pass over the to-be final output would make sense…
Anytime something negative happens: “See? It’s fun.”
Well, no more without a rebellion to oust the reigning president/dictator/autocrat
Aren’t “any place” and “any where” practically redundant?
I’d like to do that but that’s also how YouTube indicates which videos you’ve already watched, which YouTube will frequently re-serve in your recommendations.
My wife and I loved the co-op mode for 3 and were sad when 4 didn’t have it. That being said, we were pleasantly surprised with the amount and diversity of content that 4 offered and just finished getting 100% in it. The story was a little meh but the rest of the game was pretty enjoyable.
Benefit with this one is everyone can short it once the option trades become available
He got rid of like 80% of the staff. I doubt he has a functional team who can even tackle the problem.
Putin shoving his hand up Trump’s ass and making him speak like a puppet
Ctrl + C, Ctrl + V isn’t considered using AI to create a game btw… Someone should tell them that doesn’t count.
It looks so happy now that it has it’s taco!
Easy enough to understand with simple ratios. If the top 1% holds 50% of the nation’s wealth, we would expect they should pay somewhere around 50% of the nation’s taxes. If their wealth increases to 60% you would expect the amount of taxes they pay to go up by a relatively equal amount.
Conversely the lower 99% would pay an inverse proportion of taxes. If the wealthy are becoming propositionally more wealthy, the less wealthy should be paying less of the nation’s taxes.
Now, that doesn’t necessarily mean that someone in the 99% will actually pay less taxes, as their wealth is not increasing at the rate of the 1%. It just means that the wealthy should be paying more as their proportion of the nation’s wealth keeps growing.
Even in the case of identical twins, which have originally the same DNA early on, will experience multiple mutations resulting in a multiple, likely small differences despite being “identical”
Psh… I give it a month till he’s in the same or higher position with another police force…