What are passengers expected to do with this info?

they solve far more problems than they introduce.

It is worse for pedestrians, who now have twice as many traffic signals to wait for. It is worse for cyclists, with “gauntlet” bike lanes running between through- and right-turning lane. It is only better for cars…so hardly the “best” interchange in existence.

I think he means take a right onto the freeway on-ramp, just before the diverging part.

Very late:

https://www.axios.com/2021/02/13/us-tariffs-wine-cheese-imports-france-germany

Some cities will install bike racks for merchants if requested. In fact, some cities require bike racks as part of any planning permit.

It is “fuck cars” content because 1. the lack of proper bike infrastructure is what led to the crash, and 2. making road victims have to hire lawyers just to get their medical bills paid.

Oh how quickly people forget all the ways the Obama Administration turned a blind-eye to the Purdue-caused Opioid crisis, and then handed out “get of of jail free” cards to the Sacklers. No matter how much damage Trump does to the health system, it will pale in comparison to the chaos Obama inflicted on the FDA/DEA.

Most likely one contraflow bike lane, plus one car lane with sharrow, like this.

Also, bike needs to be in the center of the lane to avoid the door-zone.

Why should taxpayers subsidize someone’s dumb decision to buy a Florida beach house?

Same or higher price, but double the range.

I live in one of the blue-ist cities in California and my city council refuses to build any housing near transit or build any bike or dedicated bus lanes. There was also an attempt to use school funds to pay for a new downtown parking garage. At this point, a Trump administration is the least of my climate worries…

California: “First time?”

https://theintercept.com/2021/05/07/california-fires-chico-housing-real-estate/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/20/justice-department-antitrust-case-google-430281

Republicans have a 2024 platform. You can Google it.

No it doesn’t say that at all.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/it-now-costs-more-than-1-2-million-to-build-a-17463355.php

In the SF Bay Area, it costs over $1 million just to build one “affordable” housing unit.

Idiocracy

Federal housing policy has always been about inflating housing asset values. The Harris “plan” is just more of the same. Anyone who thinks either party actually wants to lower housing prices is delusional.

This meme is extremely naive. For many American voters, the primary residence is their one major investment – and will severely punish any elected official that reduces housing prices. The result is neither party will do much on this issue.